Earlier quoted context omitted.
So don’t try and minimize it altogether because you’re getting some elsewhere? This isn’t good logic.
When the risk is small enough, it seems rational to ignore it.
Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
41–50 of 339 posts
Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you can, there are some great borosilicate glass containers out there. I use them for everything. The ones I have seal well enough that I can fill it with soup and stick it in a backpack, ride somewhere and it's fine on the other side. Thick enough to be basically unbreakable, microwavable, dishwasher-safe, etc. Don't need to worry about tomato staining either like on plastic. I've been thrilled with mine.
Aren’t the lids typically plastic though?
Ironically though silicone is much harder to recycle though.
Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Coca-Cola cans, and probably many others, have plastic coating with BPA on the inside. But that doesn’t matter much in comparison, because PFAS (corrected) are in the product, allegedly: https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/19/simply-o...
I don't think someone trying to be totally healthy is going to be drinking Soda or any of these juices with their ridiculously high sugar content anyway.
1. Lots of drinks come in metal cans with BPA lining on the inside.
2. You can absolutely be reasonably healthy and drink some of these drinks, including the variants that are not sugar-free. I don’t think most people try to be perfectionistically healthy. But I think PFAs are not anywhere closer “reasonably healthy” to consume.
Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aren’t the lids typically plastic though?
I would have assumed (probably incorrectly) that the 'seal' which would come in contact with the glass & liquids would be a type of silicone lid, while it could be considered a type of plastic, if its a good food grade lid, I would imagine it's a bit better ? Ironically though silicone is much harder to recycle though.
Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#45My mum when I was a kid in the 90s: we don't store things in plastic, glass or ceramic only Me when I was a kid in the 90s: mum is a f'ing idiot wtf is wrong with plastic this hippy shit is dumb My mum 2020s: so plastic huh? Me 2020s: ugh.
Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#46My mum when I was a kid in the 90s: we don't store things in plastic, glass or ceramic only Me when I was a kid in the 90s: mum is a f'ing idiot wtf is wrong with plastic this hippy shit is dumb My mum 2020s: so plastic huh? Me 2020s: ugh.
If you can, there are some great borosilicate glass containers out there. I use them for everything. The ones I have seal well enough that I can fill it with soup and stick it in a backpack, ride somewhere and it's fine on the other side. Thick enough to be basically unbreakable, microwavable, dishwasher-safe, etc. Don't need to worry about tomato staining either like on plastic. I've been thrilled with mine.
The clip-retaining rims seem to love to chip on the IKEA 365 style ones.
The long-tabbed GlassLock ones seem less vulnerable to that.
Which not unique to glass boxes, I'm still amazed by how robust the living hinges can be, some are going on 10 years and haven't split yet.
Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#47Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#48Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Metal usually has a plastic coating though, doesn't it?
Coca-Cola cans, and probably many others, have plastic coating with BPA on the inside. But that doesn’t matter much in comparison, because PFAS (corrected) are in the product, allegedly: https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/19/simply-o...
Also, PFAS is not the plural of PFA - those are actually different classes of chemicals.
Re: Nanoplastic Ingestion Causes Neurological Deficits
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
A good set of mason jars is great for lunches, for salads and pastas and the like. They seal better than tupper, they're microwave-safe, they're standardized so you can get replacement lids easily, and they're pretty rugged. I use metal when the kids are too young for glass.
By "too young for glass", I'm assuming you mainly hint at weight – which happens to be basically the only, but quite significant downside to glass. The material itself is already about 1.5× to 2× as dense as your average container plastic, plus since you're aiming for at least a decent strength, on top of that the wall thickness will probably be several times larger too.