Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
11–20 of 139 posts
Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#12I don't get why it is forced to be on the Dock. I like having a super slim dock that only has open apps in it.
Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#13I would love to be able to ship apps in this, with a code bundle, so we don't need to ship a full Electron engine for every app. Even better, I wish someone would standardise it so we could still write one, ship to all platforms.
Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
One can only hope. We keep having this idea since MSHTML and XUL,and thankfully it eventually goes out of fashion. I already have a browser, an OS Web widgets, no need to package a browser with the application other than laziness. Everyone shipping Electron is yet another ChromeOS advocate.
But your "a browser" is different for other people, which one do you expect devs to target?
Alternatively, do what I have been doing since 1990, middleware for business logic with native UI integration.
The four preceding years don't count, as I was using only Timex 2068 as my single computer.
Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#15I would love to be able to ship apps in this, with a code bundle, so we don't need to ship a full Electron engine for every app. Even better, I wish someone would standardise it so we could still write one, ship to all platforms.
I imagine most developers will still elect to ship their apps using Electron for the usual Safari issues: Safari is only on macOS, very slow to adapt new web technologies and Safari updates are largely tied to macOS updates.
I'm not sure this argument holds water given the shockingly old versions of Electron that vendors ship (WhatsApp is using 13.6.9, Slack 24.2.0, Skype 19.0.9, Discord 22.3.2...)
Separately, is Safari actually slow to adopt new web technologies, or do they wait for standardisation and not simply accept the latest half-baked api of the week that Google builds for Chromium, uses across their websites, and then proclaims a New Web Standard?
Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
I imagine most developers will still elect to ship their apps using Electron for the usual Safari issues: Safari is only on macOS, very slow to adapt new web technologies and Safari updates are largely tied to macOS updates.
>very slow to adapt new web technologies I'm not sure this argument holds water given the shockingly old versions of Electron that vendors ship (WhatsApp is using 13.6.9, Slack 24.2.0, Skype 19.0.9, Discord 22.3.2...) Separately, is Safari actually slow to adopt new web technologies, or do they wait for standardisation and not simply accept the latest half-baked api of the week that Google builds for Chromium, uses a…
Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#17Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#18Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#19I don't want to be nit-picky and it might seem like a minor nuisance, but developers will need the ability to display a small banner/prompt to educate user's about the possibility of installing the website like a regular app, otherwise it will be lost on casuals. I really hope that Apple implements this fully and doesn't use strategic loopholes to sabotage Web Apps in small but clever ways.
Re: Web Apps on macOS Sonoma 14 Beta
#20I would love to be able to ship apps in this, with a code bundle, so we don't need to ship a full Electron engine for every app. Even better, I wish someone would standardise it so we could still write one, ship to all platforms.
I imagine most developers will still elect to ship their apps using Electron for the usual Safari issues: Safari is only on macOS, very slow to adapt new web technologies and Safari updates are largely tied to macOS updates.
Cautious.
Chrome often adds features that are used to track you or have a negative impact on performance and battery life.