Earlier quoted context omitted.
If anyone should be punished, it's the lawyers who enabled them to persist in this course of action. Perhaps basic facts can't be copyrighted, but sometimes collections of facts are given some protection. The telephone directory is a classic example. Given the sincerity of the apology, I think it was a honest mistake and a welcome example of the legal system working the way it should. At least after EFF is on the cas…
You have your example backward. Feist v. Rural held that telephone books are not subject to copyright. Just because something was laborious to compile does not make it copyrightable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_v._Rural
In Europe, the law differs. Specifically, 'sweat of the brow', rejected by Feist in the US, is a factor in Europe: http://www.bitlaw.com/copyright/database.html#directive