Live data from Hacker News

I will never participate in weird internet caste systems

j3s.sh

31–40 of 67 posts

Re: I will never participate in weird internet caste systems

#31
If not having access to "super reactions" or special avatars on Discord make you feel a genuine and affecting sense of envy and self-consciousness I uh... don't know what to tell you. It's some gifs, you just can't post some gifs.

This feels monumentally overblown to me. I don't pay for nitro but I clearly benefit from all the people who do and if they get some fun, silly little perks that's fine.

Re: I will never participate in weird internet caste systems

#32

Internet caste systems is just social status hierarchy. Or rather, showing off to others you're higher on the ladder. People don't buy sports cars, or extremely expensive clothing because it's functional. But rather to project their above the plebs. Games have skins or icons marking how high up you are. Most importantly, very expensive skins. Honestly, discords isn't bad, you're not constrained by being a free user.…

The sports cars analogy doesn’t resonate with me because there’s a functional difference between regular cars and sports cars. And plenty of people buy sports cars like Miatas, which have less than zero cachet or coolness factor, and thus can’t really project being “above” anyone.

Clothing with the modifier “extremely” probably makes sense though.

Re: I will never participate in weird internet caste systems

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Has that ever worked?

yeah except the capitalists killed it. napster, bitorrent etc... being tried now with mastodon et al...

> except the capitalists

The article is about monetising social status, and I think the majority of criticisms about capitalism are actually thinly veiled complaints about social status (often complaints about how others get more, rarely mentioning someone’s benefits compared against those that get less).

However social status exists independent of capitalism.

Replace capitalism, and you just end up with similar problems, just rotated, because the underlying motivation is the human drive for social status.

The article implies a wish for a world without social status signals, and rightly denigrates caste systems. Can we even change our nature to avoid status signalling?

Virtue signalling is also status signalling - just declaring a particular caste - and this article clearly declares their virtue.

I agree we should aspire to not be judgemental, and we should aspire to generosity, kindness, forgiveness. Regardless of what ingroup we belong to. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be aware of human failings, and imperfection in our systems is a compromise.

Post reply on HN