Live data from Hacker News

Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

eff.org

51–60 of 162 posts

Re: Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

#51
post #38

When I go to https://google.com/history while logged into my google mail account, I get redirected to https://www.google.com/ The redirected Google home page clearly shows me as logged in. Am I doing it wrong?

I had the same thing, the non-SSL version, http://google.com/history seemed to work correctly though.

I'm getting a "This service is not available" with links to a help page that does not exist.

Re: Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

#54
post #11

Someone should write a Firefox plugin to allow people to anonymously exchange google cookies, like you can with the grocery store club cards.

http://www.googlesharing.net/

Is there a version that works with FF8?

Re: Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

#55
I never realized you could access your search data history. It was really fascinating to see the different visualizations including my search concentration by hour and days of the week.

That said, even as a non-statistician, it wasn't hard to imagine the amount of information Google could infer by focusing on an individual. I had a data set exceeding 50k searches with the resulting click-throughs on my account. (Plus, they can of course leverage their massive db to help eliminate anomalies like Whitney Houston)

In addition to the basics like big item purchase history, hobbies, and problems (e.g. sickness); I wouldn't be surprised if Google could predict my relationship status and sexual preferences.

Custom search results are great, but I'm extremely happy to have been given the option to delete that profile. If anything, it is the single largest factor pushing back to Firefox and possibly DuckDuckGo.

Re: Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

#56

I use google apps for domains and I get the following message: "Web History is not available for MY_DOMAIN. Learn more about Google products you can use with MY_EMAIL." Is Google collecting this data and not giving me the option to turn it off, or are they not collecting the data?

If it's not enabled, the logs are not associated with your account. You could enable the service in the apps control panel (assuming you're the administrator) and check for yourself, though.

Re: Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

#57

When I go to https://google.com/history while logged into my google mail account, I get redirected to https://www.google.com/ The redirected Google home page clearly shows me as logged in. Am I doing it wrong?

Same for me. What helped is going there manually. Click on the gear icon and select Web History. You will be prompted to confirm login and then you'll proceed to web history page. I guess it's for security reasons so some malicious javascript won't grab your history (that easy).

Re: Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

#58

When I go to https://google.com/history while logged into my google mail account, I get redirected to https://www.google.com/ The redirected Google home page clearly shows me as logged in. Am I doing it wrong?

https://www.google.com/history/ works for me. Any http(s?)://google.com URL tends to redirect to www.google.{local suffix}.

Re: Remove Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect

#60
post #4

The official title of the article is "How to Remove Your Google Search History Before Google's New Privacy Policy Takes Effect", and the writing itself is much more neutral than this submission title. I'm still not sure why people are afraid of Google's new privacy policy. I understand that there are people who have specific privacy needs, but outside that scope I doubt you have anything to worry about. It's doubtful…

My concern is that someone out there is accumulating a huge amount of very personal information about me. It happens to be a corporation that has a legal obligation not to me but to its shareholders and that obligation is to maximise profit. It also has a legal obligation to the US government and the US courts, a government I have no right to elect and a legal system I cannot afford. And here's my point: I simply can…

> It happens to be a corporation that has a legal obligation not to me but to its shareholders and that obligation is to maximise profit.

That's a myth. I belived it was true until someone here on HN linked to a Harvard Business Review article debunking it. Unfortunately I can't find the article, but here's a blog post discussing the issue: http://truthonthemarket.com/2010/07/27/the-shareholder-wealt...

Post reply on HN