Live data from Hacker News

The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

wired.com

281–290 of 310 posts

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#281
post #17

TL;DR: If all media tell you the same thing over and over again, just don't do it and you should be safe. Propaganda is propaganda, don't get confused if many people around you fall for it, just stay on your path and trust your intuition and supress the urge to follow the herd.

Yeah, that's why I use a charcoal grill inside. The media keeps saying to use it outside but I can't trust them.

Sarcasm, I know, but sir you do make a royal fool of yourself by not noticing the distinction.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#282

In all of these posts there is a strong 'what were they thinking' reaction. - remember hindsight. At the time, how were they supposed to know, by looking into their crystal ball? It was a fast, dynamically changing situation, everyone was getting sick, who a the time could say 'yeah, people are dying, but YOLO, no need to sanitize your hands.' Lot of freaking armchair quarterbacks in the 'lets criticize the medical c…

> It was a fast, dynamically changing situation, everyone was getting sick...

I think one could say a lot of the reaction of governments around the world was knee-jerk, "let's copy what that other government is doing" kind of thinking. Not that this is specific to the CoVid situation, there's plenty of it going on at any given moment.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#283
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can clearly look at year-over-year statistics and see the increased death count. What do you think caused it? An increase in eye-sight-related car accidents? All the people complaining about 'comorbidities' don't understand how cause of death is reported. When someone has Cancer, but dies from Pneumonia, should they list Cancer or the Pneumonia? All diseases have some 'comorbidities'. But if they didn't have Covi…

Sweden has the lowest excess deaths count in the western world. They didn't lock down. That's not a coincidence. Lockdowns increased social dysfunction, and this is the root of excess deaths. Funny how you also aren't mentioning the education disaster that the hysterical, statistically illiterate cowards who closed schools caused. Schools in EU and Asia were open. Just the North American fools closed theirs. Btw, I k…

> Sweden has the lowest excess deaths count in the western world

Is that per capita or absolute numbers? Could you provide a reference?

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the opposite in red states. People harass strangers in public for wearing masks. Same vibe as the maskers in blue states. It's the never-maskers vs. the ever-maskers.

What "maskers in blue states"? I hardly see anyone in a mask, let alone harassing people not in a mask . That was my question! Where is this happening? Cause I'm really having a hard time reconciling people's random online claims with anything I've seen while out and about daily near me... Is there just an Extremely Online segment of the public that keeps repeating 2020's arguments without actually getting out much t…

Are you not in a city? I still see people masking all the time, though it’s never a lot of them unless the setting still requires masking. Most folk dance events I would otherwise be attending still require masks, and often N95s. There’s much less lingering masking and vaccine requirements in the suburbs, though.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The 'hindsight' does come into play. At the beginning of quarantine, they still didn't know what was happening, some countries were having 10% mortality, people were dying, bodies were stacking up. But, oh, so sorry we jumped the gun, next time we'll let it rampage before doing anything.

> some countries were having 10% mortality Huh? Like 1 in 10 people that caught the virus died? Where do you think this happened? This may have been true for very tiny portions of the pouplation, like people over the age of 90 (who had a 20% ifr according to https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6... ) but otherwise the country with the highest ifr seems to be portugal at 2%, and even that would…

Italy. Early on when we still didn't know what was happening, Italy was reporting those numbers. It was later, after we had lockdown that it turned out that maybe it was a select groups, and it was older and over-weight Italians. I'd try to take the time to find a reference if I cared anymore about all the counter-counter-counter opinions in this thread.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#286

In all of these posts there is a strong 'what were they thinking' reaction. - remember hindsight. At the time, how were they supposed to know, by looking into their crystal ball? It was a fast, dynamically changing situation, everyone was getting sick, who a the time could say 'yeah, people are dying, but YOLO, no need to sanitize your hands.' Lot of freaking armchair quarterbacks in the 'lets criticize the medical c…

> It was a fast, dynamically changing situation, everyone was getting sick... I think one could say a lot of the reaction of governments around the world was knee-jerk, "let's copy what that other government is doing" kind of thinking. Not that this is specific to the CoVid situation, there's plenty of it going on at any given moment.

Everyone likes to blame China. There is no opinion on China that can be stated without a huge counter group claiming the opposite. -- But, way at the beginning, they did cancel Chinese New Year and lockdown the country. So where it originated, by whatever way you want to believe, they were seeing deaths, a pandemic was spreading, and they cancelled New Years. They obviously saw the danger of an entire country being sick at once. -- Isn't it more likely that the reason we can argue about this, is because lockdowns worked, since more people lived, we can now argue that we did too much. But the reason more people lived was because we did take action, because people lived doesn't mean we could have done nothing and also had people live.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#287
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know of people who still won't go to church because of all of the above and are, for all intents and purposes, still deathly afraid to leave their homes. Regardless of what some might say in argument against your point(s), I absolutely do think that part of the public health emergency was the abject panic that ensued following COVID. I stopped exercising caution earlier on in the pandemic, because in my estimation…

Both you and I had similar experiences. My wife was hospitalized for unknown bacterial infection what the doctors assumed was caused by masks. I contracted covid in February 2021, before my age group was eligible for vaccine. Like you I had recognized relatively early on that my level of physical fitness and nutrition likely made it low risk for me. Like you I had minimal symptoms except for a total loss of sense of…

There is a lot of opinions now, and you seem to be conflating a lot of groups of people ad-hoc just as they are of you. It is true that you can re-catch Covid, so the people claiming Natural immunity as some cure-all for the situation are wrong. What if we didn't lock down, and let it spread naturally, then the entire population like your brother would be sick at the same time, thus overwhelming the system and more people dying.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#288
post #268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yo Triggered. Maybe spring 2021. Guess part of problem with any issue these days, half of what you say is true, the other half starts to sound like 'crazy old guy screaming at the wind'. Yes, there was some group hysteria, no there wasn't a group intent on 'scaring' the population to 'gain control'. Yes, requiring a mask out on a nature trail is little nutz, but also there were some going the other way 'I can cough o…

I didn't say "gain control". You said that and put it in quotes. Public health leaders, such as Debbie Birx, believed that the ends justified the means, and knowingly obfuscated the risk stratification by age in a cynical effort to get younger people to comply with lockdowns out of self preservation. She wrote about this in her book, and also wrote that she and her colleagues KNEW that "2 weeks to flatten the curve"…

Isn't that the point? If we let everyone catch it 'naturally', the young, then it would be impossible to isolate the groups at risk. Everyone seems to decry the lockdown, but if it was allowed to spread naturally, to all the young and healthy, then how would you prevent all the old teachers from getting it? Partial isolation in our world is impossible. I think you are cherry picking from her a little, at the time people were not listening at all, so being extra scary, and end-justifying to save people probably did occur to some as ok. But her saying there was a 'white lie' isn't a gatcha, there was a conspiracy, it doesn't mean suddenly the entire endeavor was wrong, we should do nothing, no lockdowns, let it spread.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#289
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can clearly look at year-over-year statistics and see the increased death count. What do you think caused it? An increase in eye-sight-related car accidents? All the people complaining about 'comorbidities' don't understand how cause of death is reported. When someone has Cancer, but dies from Pneumonia, should they list Cancer or the Pneumonia? All diseases have some 'comorbidities'. But if they didn't have Covi…

Sweden has the lowest excess deaths count in the western world. They didn't lock down. That's not a coincidence. Lockdowns increased social dysfunction, and this is the root of excess deaths. Funny how you also aren't mentioning the education disaster that the hysterical, statistically illiterate cowards who closed schools caused. Schools in EU and Asia were open. Just the North American fools closed theirs. Btw, I k…

Isn't Sweden already spread out? Kind of isolated already? It does seem like Sweden is held up as some special case as justification that lockdowns didn't need to happen. But aren't Swedes generally thin and healthy? Americans are fat and sick already, and probably less sanitary too, so not having lockdowns would have bigger impact.

Re: The explosive legacy of the hand sanitizer boom

#290
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can clearly look at year-over-year statistics and see the increased death count. What do you think caused it? An increase in eye-sight-related car accidents? All the people complaining about 'comorbidities' don't understand how cause of death is reported. When someone has Cancer, but dies from Pneumonia, should they list Cancer or the Pneumonia? All diseases have some 'comorbidities'. But if they didn't have Covi…

Sweden has the lowest excess deaths count in the western world. They didn't lock down. That's not a coincidence. Lockdowns increased social dysfunction, and this is the root of excess deaths. Funny how you also aren't mentioning the education disaster that the hysterical, statistically illiterate cowards who closed schools caused. Schools in EU and Asia were open. Just the North American fools closed theirs. Btw, I k…

That the vaccine causes more deaths than the virus itself is kind of a conspiracy theory. How is that even being used as reasoning these days?

Just saying correlation isn't causation is a cop out, just because something is correlated doesn't mean it can't be reasoned about, used as a data point.

Everything you say is true, it was hard times for a lot of people, drug use, crime, suicides, all up. What is wrong is using that to justify that we should have let more people die from the disease itself.

"Man, we would be so much better off, with less drug us, less crime, less suicides, if we had just allowed more people to die. If we only had the courage to let this spread naturally and allow more people to die, and be put out of their misery, times would be better now".

Post reply on HN