Live data from Hacker News

Archive of the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1945-46

library.stanford.edu

11–20 of 150 posts

Re: Archive of the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1945-46

#12
post #10

The Nuremberg Trials were fascinating. While I think many of the individuals leading the tribunal were trying to do a good job in the tradition of their respective nations' legal frameworks, the victorious allies could really not see eye to eye on what was a fair measure of retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, etc. So my take is that largely all legal norms were discarded or violated, and the tribunal had to reac…

Are there any good documentaries or books that dig into this without getting to academic?

Re: Archive of the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1945-46

#13
post #12
post #10

The Nuremberg Trials were fascinating. While I think many of the individuals leading the tribunal were trying to do a good job in the tradition of their respective nations' legal frameworks, the victorious allies could really not see eye to eye on what was a fair measure of retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, etc. So my take is that largely all legal norms were discarded or violated, and the tribunal had to reac…

Are there any good documentaries or books that dig into this without getting to academic?

Eichmann in My Hands by Peter Malkin

Re: Archive of the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1945-46

#15
post #3

[flagged]

> Wow we sure threw that one out the window with the covid 19 vaccine didn't we? No, we have not. Also, it's completely asinine to compare voluntary vaccination by an incredibly safe vaccine in the middle of a pandemic that claimed millions of lives, with forced medical experiments often resulting in deaths.

> an incredibly safe vaccine

yeah, i'm going to need you to prove that statement by showing me the standard 10-12 year safety studies available for those "incredibly safe" mRNA vaccines.

Re: Archive of the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1945-46

#16
post #12
post #10

The Nuremberg Trials were fascinating. While I think many of the individuals leading the tribunal were trying to do a good job in the tradition of their respective nations' legal frameworks, the victorious allies could really not see eye to eye on what was a fair measure of retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, etc. So my take is that largely all legal norms were discarded or violated, and the tribunal had to reac…

Are there any good documentaries or books that dig into this without getting to academic?

I'd be very curious to see what people recommend since I think it's very important to consider how the victors behaved at the end of the war. I studied some details about Nuremberg while in law school, from an Anglo American legal point of view, and then I spent a lot of time on wikipedia learning the historical background of the individuals involved.

Re: Archive of the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1945-46

#19
They had also accepted Soviet insistence that only Axis aggression was covered by the new court - otherwise the Soviet authorities would have been in the dock as well for carving up Poland in 1939 and attacking Finland three months later. - http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/20...

Re: Archive of the Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, 1945-46

#20
post #3

[flagged]

> Wow we sure threw that one out the window with the covid 19 vaccine didn't we? No, we have not. Also, it's completely asinine to compare voluntary vaccination by an incredibly safe vaccine in the middle of a pandemic that claimed millions of lives, with forced medical experiments often resulting in deaths.

In some countries vaccination was planned to not be voluntary. This was the case in Austria, with a government stipulated mandate.[1] The situation changed rapidly, but just pointing out that vaccination against COVID was not always planned to be voluntary, especially as the OP mentioned his employer was mandating it.

[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60155635

Post reply on HN