But overall the design of this tool is very difficult for me to use. It's trying too hard to be pretty, at the expensive of utility. I found the Typography section to be really difficult to grok with a complete lack of labels and borders around text boxes. It's neat that you have the same flexbox controls that Webflow had in 2015, but the way those icons are laid out makes it so inscruitable.
Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
21–30 of 299 posts
Re: Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
#22Re: Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
#23I think the comments criticising the pricing are wrong, you can't compare one generalist tool to another highly specialised tool. But on top of that comparing to Figma, Framer or other VC backed products is a mistake, these products are priced to capture market share and grow rabidly. They are clearly underpriced. I may be wrong but CSS Pro looks like a small bootstrapped product, pricing for market growth doesn't ne…
This is unfortunately a very common strategy, and I rather pay for indie developer bit more than a tech company with a large amount of investors.
Re: Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
#24> Copy the designs of your favorite websites, frameworks, or themes. Extract the HTML and CSS code of an element and all its children in seconds.
> Not the right element you're looking for? Precisely re-target any DOM element using your keyboard's arrow keys (▲ ▼).
The documentation talks about it a little bit but not much.
I am wondering if this feature is another cheapskate implementation that doesn't actually do what it says it does. How for example would this tool handle the Firebase[0] featured header?
The other features look OK, but I don't think I could justify the price though. If you want to charge for it so much, maybe change your pricing to a yearly license and then do updates, and simply restrict new updates to people who stop subscribing. Seems like a lot more reasonable approach and it also gives you a chance to really work on extending this product beyond what it currently does.
[0]: https://firebase.blog/posts/2023/05/whats-new-at-google-io
Re: Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
#25Re: Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
#26Re: Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
#27I think I'm inclined to agree on some of the other comments about pricing. It doesn't sit quite right in comparison to what I pay for other paid tools that I use daily.
I can see myself using something like this, and I don't mind paying for great software, but there is something about the $30/month entry price that just stops me considering it further. Maybe I need to actually use it to understand that it's worth this, but it's not clear enough to me coming to it cold.
One criticism. I clicked on the "Try on this page" to test it out, and after being initially impressed I clicked on "Try it Free" in the menu, assuming this was a link to see what free/trial options were available, but the link didn't do anything. It took several page refreshes and re-clicking this to realise that this was just doubling up the function of the "Try on this page" option and in fact there is no free trial available.
Overall though, seriously impressive work.
Re: Show HN: I made CSS Pro, a re-imagined Devtools for web design
#28Looks very cool. Sadly, it is very expensive for our small startup though (we are already paying github, jira, confluence, google suite, figma, miro, adobe, etc.).
Also, figma has figjams which is similar to Miro for many use cases.