491–500 of 817 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Internet? Try the anarchists cookbook!
If you actually try the anarchists cookbook, you will find many of the recipes don't work or work that well.
You’re screwed, the AI was your most important tool and it’s broken and there’s nothing you can do about it, it’s a black box, you don’t control it.
I don't think it's any worse at all. I think what most people are expressing here is reaching the limits of the technology and realizing that it's not magic.
Where does phind.com say that they use GPT-4?
Though even when it was easier to get it to use GPT-4 it wasn't consistent, and would only use it when it inferred that the query was complex/technical enough.
I don't think it's any worse at all. I think what most people are expressing here is reaching the limits of the technology and realizing that it's not magic.
No, OpenAI 100% pushed an update recently that is very noticeable where they basically "nerfed" the responses. I'm sure it was a business decision (either costing them too much to give away the kitchen sink for free or they want to turn around and charge more for the "really good, old" version of GPT-4 ) but you can visually see where the bot used to try to answer complex tasks, now it has an extra layer where it say…
Chat GPT 4 has ongoing training, such as using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to tune it to provide "better" responses, "safer" answers, and to generally obey the system prompts. There's a release every few weeks. Yes, I've noticed too that recently it has become very "cagey", qualifying everything to death with "As an AI model...". A paper[1] that took snapshots monthly mentioned that as the initi…
> Evil and accurate or woke and dumb. Apparently, we can choose. That's because woke is dumb. It's a set of highly biased, inconsistent and reason-defying ideas, evolving under selection pressures that favor emotional appeals and intellectual dishonesty, because one of the core assumptions seems to be that it's not about finding what's right and good for everyone - it's heavily overshooting it in an attempt to cancel…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is racism different from stereotype? How is stereotype different from pattern recognition? These questions don't seem to go through the minds of people when developing "unbiased/impartial" technology. There is no such thing as objective. So, why pretend to be objective and unbiased, when we all know its a lie? Worst, if you pretend to be objective but aren't, then you are actually racist.
I’m tired of the “it’s not racist if aggregate statistics support my racism” thing. Racism, like other isms, means a belief that a person’s characteristics define their identity. It doesn’t matter if confounding factors mean that you can show that people of their race are associated with bad behaviors or low scores or whatever. I used GPT3.5 to generate 100 short descriptions of families for a project. Every single o…
I don't think it's any worse at all. I think what most people are expressing here is reaching the limits of the technology and realizing that it's not magic.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who has the necessary resources to run, let alone train the model?
I think a lot of people are unaware that these models have an enormous human training component performed through companies such as Amazon Mechanical Truk and dataannotation.tech. Called Human Intelligence Tasks, a large number of people have been working in this area for close to a decade. Dataannotation Tech claims to have over 100k workers. From Cloud Research, "How Many Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers Are There in…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's blocked in the EU because they don't want to/can't comply with GDPR.
It is not GDPR, it is available in some countries outside the EU with GDPR-like privacy regimes.