One Click Deepfake • Hacker News Board

Re: One Click Deepfake

#31

Post by x-complexity » Tue, May 30, 2023, 1:07 AM UTC

s0md3v wrote: post #17

yreg wrote: post #13

The readme sounds angry. When you run this without ffmpeg, it prints: >python run.py ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the d…

Author here, sorry about that :( Such software attract all kind of people including the casuals who end up creating github issues for problems that can be solved with a single google search or reading the docs. I got tired of multiple issues regarding ffmpeg and ended up dropping this in there. Not very proud.

Honestly, I like the abrasiveness. It adds a certain charm to the program when it directly chastises you for not reading the provided documentation.

For such situations like this where they *should* be following the setup procedures, the errors should be explicit & straightforward: Follow the setup docs.

Re: One Click Deepfake

#32

Post by Proven » Tue, May 30, 2023, 1:33 AM UTC

s0md3v wrote: post #17

yreg wrote: post #13

The readme sounds angry. When you run this without ffmpeg, it prints: >python run.py ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the docs you idiot. ffmpeg is not installed. Read the d…

Author here, sorry about that :( Such software attract all kind of people including the casuals who end up creating github issues for problems that can be solved with a single google search or reading the docs. I got tired of multiple issues regarding ffmpeg and ended up dropping this in there. Not very proud.

[dead]

Re: One Click Deepfake

#33

Post by udev4096 » Tue, May 30, 2023, 5:06 AM UTC

yborg wrote: post #15

rvz wrote: post #3

Let's accelerate the AI carnage please. Now with one click!

This gets really spicy when it can be adapted to run realtime so you can map a face on a Teams call, etc. and combine with voice mapping so you can seamlessly impersonate someone for those "It's me" extortion calls to grandmas. All of those hours of Tiktoks are now an endless goldmine for scammers...

Yeah but it would require a lot of compute power. Even a 1 minute clip takes significant amount of time to deepfake on consumer hardware

Re: One Click Deepfake

#34

Post by sentientslug » Tue, May 30, 2023, 5:48 AM UTC

udev4096 wrote: post #33

yborg wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This gets really spicy when it can be adapted to run realtime so you can map a face on a Teams call, etc. and combine with voice mapping so you can seamlessly impersonate someone for those "It's me" extortion calls to grandmas. All of those hours of Tiktoks are now an endless goldmine for scammers...

Yeah but it would require a lot of compute power. Even a 1 minute clip takes significant amount of time to deepfake on consumer hardware

About 30 minutes on an i9-10850K

Re: One Click Deepfake

#35

Post by PeterStuer » Tue, May 30, 2023, 6:56 AM UTC

digitalsushi wrote: post #18

s0md3v wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Author here, sorry about that :( Such software attract all kind of people including the casuals who end up creating github issues for problems that can be solved with a single google search or reading the docs. I got tired of multiple issues regarding ffmpeg and ended up dropping this in there. Not very proud.

Always assume your next boss is already using your software

Might indeed be a good test to weed out the too fragile company cultures you would want to avoid.

Re: One Click Deepfake

#36

Post by PeterStuer » Tue, May 30, 2023, 6:59 AM UTC

rvz wrote: post #3

Let's accelerate the AI carnage please. Now with one click!

Can't have the plebs have access to our tools! /s

Re: One Click Deepfake

#37

Post by BurnGpuBurn » Tue, May 30, 2023, 8:57 AM UTC

From the readme: "Users must get consent from the concerned people before using their face". [0]

So I assume the author received consent from Scarlett Johansson. Well done, it must be hard to get a hold of her.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=github.com/s0md3v

Re: One Click Deepfake

#38

Post by udev4096 » Wed, May 31, 2023, 4:55 AM UTC

sentientslug wrote: post #34

udev4096 wrote: post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah but it would require a lot of compute power. Even a 1 minute clip takes significant amount of time to deepfake on consumer hardware

About 30 minutes on an i9-10850K

Still far away from real time face swapping