Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Deciding what's true can be a challenge. It's not too hard when you hear ridiculous stories and treat them as if they were to happen today. The one I remember from the church event was about a big guy that couldn't be subdued and then ended up breaking through chains. So many questions from a single statement. Everyone else literally sat there and didn't blink an eye.
> It's not too hard when you hear ridiculous stories and treat them as if they were to happen today. Maybe it hinges on which parts of the stories you imagining happening today. E.g., if Jesus rose from the dead next week, I'd find it pretty thought-provoking. If he were merely crucified but stayed dead, I'd cross Christianity of my list of plausible world views. I.e., a lot really depends on whether or not those mir…
In today’s environment, how would you evaluate the truth value of a claim like that? It seems like the only way to 100% convinced of the truth would be as a first-hand witness, unless there was some kind of detailed and airtight evaluation.
Maybe the foundation document for the next world religion will be a 100-page paper that definitely establishes causality.