Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not what the terms socialism and capitalism mean. They describe the process, not end result. You can have full blown worker coops in the capitalist system, the question is if they are state mandated or not. The definition of socialism isn't any sytem with a good outcome for workers.
So are you saying that socialism can only exist if it's imposed and maintained by the state? (i.e. no democratic society can be socialist by definition?)
I 'm not sure I understand the question? Socialism is a political philosophy on how the state should operate and what it should permit. It IS a description of the states behavior.
Democracy has nothing to do with it. You can have a socialist country with a king, or with direct democracy and no leader.
You can't have a socialist state without socialist laws and rules.