Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
kuenzi.dev
Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
1–10 of 311 posts
Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#2Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#3Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#4EDIT: nope, not the default. From the data sheet, last sentence:
"To prevent brute-force attacks on the password, the maximum allowed number of negative password verification attempts can be set using AUTHLIM. This mechanism is disabled by setting AUTHLIM to a value of 000b, which is also the initial state of NTAG21x."
So Philips went out of their way to secure that toothbrush head. That's reassuring.
Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#5Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#6"But how do you know when it's time to change the brush?"
Well, how about when it starts getting soft?
Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#7Why is this kind of thing legal? For how many politicians and activist groups claim to care about the environment, why hasn't anyone introduced a bill to ban intentionally turning useful equipment into waste? Any legitimate security needs would be fulfilled just as well by doing a full wipe and factory reset instead.
Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#8I have one, but it never occurred to me to want to hack it. "But how do you know when it's time to change the brush?" Well, how about when it starts getting soft?
[0] I'm either easy on toothbrush heads, or Philips is lying, because when the indicator says "buy a new head" it still has plenty of life IMO. Bristles straight and tall, just like a new one, but no blue left being the only difference between that and new. So I ignore it and get a new one when the bristles go a little wonky.
Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#9This was an enjoyable read. My GE fridge uses RFID for keeping track of when to change the water filter. This isn't really an area I'm familiar with but I'm curious how much I would be able to figure out with the right tools.
Re: Hacking my “smart” toothbrush
#10Kind of concerning this could turn into another toner ink situation