Live data from Hacker News

Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

block21m.substack.com

151–160 of 235 posts

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

« The “electronic cash” envisioned by Satoshi is cash; it is not notes, scrip or bank credits. We have come to think of bank notes as cash, but they are actually contracts for debt. The note holder is owed something by the issuer. Cash is a commodity with certain properties that make it useful as money. Cash is largely gone from the world, and people cannot return to physical commodity money, as it cannot be moved on…

Modern day paper currency are not debt instruments. They are very much cash. Whether bitcoin is used for direct payments or payment channel settlements is irrelevant. What is important is self-custody. Cash works and has the properties it does because it is a (mostly) fungible bearer bond. Bitcoin is also a (mostly) fungible bearer bond regardless of whether you transact on chain or through lightning.

They are debt instruments. Liabilities of the central bank that issued them.

Cash was the gold that you used to be able to redeem said liabilities for. These days, you can simply transfer the bank's liability to you to someone else, as a way to offset your own liability.

Just because the bank has no intention of ever paying cash at this point ever since Nixon left behind specie payments doesn't change the fact that these notes are still issued as liabilities.

And when I say issued by the central bank, I do mean only the paper bills that are issued. Most money that exists in bank accounts is issued by the various commercial banks that operate within the banking system (when they issue you a loan, they don't go out and find other money; they simply credit your account with the amount of the loan, and that money was simply loaned into existence as a liability of that bank).

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's funny because bitcoiners can't shut the fuck up about Visa whenever the abysmal throughput of the bitcoin network or its humongous power consumption is brought up.

AI could barely put together a sentence a decade ago but I didn’t tell anyone to shut the fuck up about it, it was pretty cool still even if it barely worked. Almost like technology progresses.

AI had tangible use cases even when it wasn't developed to the point where it could be applied to those. The problems AI is used to solve, existed before the technology to solve them.

Bitcoin, and all the other "crypto"-tokens, have been looking for a problem to solve for 14 years.

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine if Visa and Mastercard formed a duopoly and used their market power to extract fees from merchants to the point of warranting government action to cap the fees.

Imagine if government couldn't cap those fees.

Congrats, you won the imagination chain!

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#154
post #6

Can anyone summarize the implications of this?

It was a nice surprise for the miners. I think the minting event was good sign for bitcoin. But one person having a bunch of inscriptions that they paid dearly for? Inconsequential.

also pushed for binance to support lightning network, which brings greater adoption of that tech

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI could barely put together a sentence a decade ago but I didn’t tell anyone to shut the fuck up about it, it was pretty cool still even if it barely worked. Almost like technology progresses.

AI had tangible use cases even when it wasn't developed to the point where it could be applied to those. The problems AI is used to solve, existed before the technology to solve them. Bitcoin, and all the other "crypto"-tokens, have been looking for a problem to solve for 14 years.

A problem to solve? It is not uncommon for companies to loose over 2% of revenue in banking fees and other enforced banking inefficiencies for transactions that could be handled much more cheaply and efficently with crypto solutions

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI could barely put together a sentence a decade ago but I didn’t tell anyone to shut the fuck up about it, it was pretty cool still even if it barely worked. Almost like technology progresses.

AI had tangible use cases even when it wasn't developed to the point where it could be applied to those. The problems AI is used to solve, existed before the technology to solve them. Bitcoin, and all the other "crypto"-tokens, have been looking for a problem to solve for 14 years.

It's the new money, I mean it's an investment, I mean it's a store of value, it is a tech backbone for web 3.0, it is an online deed...

Soon they will find something it is reaaaally good at. Might solve some prime number conjecture by accident if they solve enough sudokus, I mean hashes.

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#157
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> they pushed up fees for everyone else (there is limited block space, so miners take the highest bids) Imagine if your Visa card became hundreds of times more expensive to use during the Christmas shopping period.

Imagine if Visa and Mastercard formed a duopoly and used their market power to extract fees from merchants to the point of warranting government action to cap the fees.

...and that still got to lower prices than bitcoin transactions

Wild, isn't it ?

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, imagine. However, bitcoin isn't trying to be Visa.

Where did you get this impression? I've been involved with bitcoin since 2010, and replacing Visa has absolutely been the goal since the very beginning.

That was the advertisement material. Only people that think it could with its pathetic transaction volume were delusional

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#159
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> Imagine if your Visa card became hundreds of times more expensive to use during the Christmas shopping period. > My Visa card doesn't cost me anything to use Gp said imagine

0 * 1000 = 0 Actually, my card costs me negative money to use. I get cash back with no annual fee.

That's just costing other side of the transaction

Re: Most Bitcoin Inscriptions belong to a single person

#160
post #94
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, you’re the one who got duped, if you genuinely believe that every single NFT is a scam and that you understand them better than every single NFT owner.

If I believe 99% of all NFTs sold were get-rich-quick scams, and because of that I've never have bought an NFT, how am I being duped? What am I missing by not being involved in it? Or more accurately, what did I miss out on? Seems like I missed out as much as I missed out not getting any Beanie Babies.

99% ?

What's the 1% was used for ? I to this date haven't seen actual use case that wouldn't be either useless or "why you can't just a database, you own all of the ecosystem around it anyway".

Post reply on HN