Earlier quoted context omitted.
Serious question: who has a decent plan to create proof-of-human systems that are not only CAPTCHA based? We will soon need this, and I feel government will gladly present a solution: provide your ID when you connect to the Internet, and we will guarantee you are a human. Who's actually working on this and has released papers I can study? Because all this AI nonsense will only accelerate us towards this total control…
> Serious question: who has a decent plan to create proof-of-human systems that are not only CAPTCHA based? > We will soon need this, and I feel government will gladly present a solution: provide your ID when you connect to the Internet, and we will guarantee you are a human.' I'm extremely hesitant to give any State the ability to track an individual user's online activity that intensely. It's been extensively docum…
The claims on the mCaptcha site contradict this. They say it takes about 2 seconds worst case for a computer to do the work, which is hashing sha 256. Looking around, an unaccelerated celron is about 1/20th the speed of a single ryzen core, and gpus are much faster.
Assuming the attacker has an 8 core ryzen with no gpu, they can hash 160 times faster than the person with an older machine.
Assuming the 2 sec upper bound is correct, this means a sub $1000 desktop can create 80 accounts per second, or 4800 accounts per minute.
If they are operating a botnet, then they presumably have access to more than one machine.