Live data from Hacker News

How much of AI's recent success is due to the Forer Effect?

shkspr.mobi

1–10 of 83 posts

Re: How much of AI's recent success is due to the Forer Effect?

#3
Seems a very specific scenario where you are well-known enough to be able to ask an LLM what it thinks of you and use that criteria to judge how good it is. I don't see Barnum statements being applicable in many other use cases.

It didn't know who I was at all, a great relief all told. The eye of Sauron has not fallen on me yet, it seems.

Re: How much of AI's recent success is due to the Forer Effect?

#4
I'm not convinced by this particular test.

If you were asked to describe a family member, partner, or best friend, I'd bet a good chunk of it would be Forer Effect like statements.

A good way to A/B test this theory would be to ask folks to pick between AI generated statements of a famous person, and snippets from a human-written profile on them.

Re: How much of AI's recent success is due to the Forer Effect?

#10

The Forer Effect can't make chatGPT generate syntactically correct and functional code snippets that I use every day at work.

The odd thing is that some people report much better results than others. Most literature on the subject points out the importance of a "human in the loop"

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13187

Generally, chatbots function in direct communication with humans and do not function autonomously. Thus they are dependent on not just human meaning-making but human thirst for meaning which will find it even when it isn't there.

Post reply on HN