If people are surpassing GPT4 with finetuned Llama-7B, this is the end for NotOpenAI's parade
It’s clickbait. The page clearly says API related. Scummy approach to wording but totally expected.
Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
51–60 of 123 posts
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What are you basing this on? History. We have had a period of adaptation and experimentation with every other invention in history. This one likely will be no different. > Won't it just be used to augment the amount of harm that humans can do? Sure, but that's everything that makes us more capable. It also makes us more able to defend and create.
>History Right, I learned from Napoleon about the dangers of AI... The large land mammals were doing pretty well too, until a bipedal superintelligence showed up. History is a get thing to learn from and a very poor thing to assume is going to repeat.
You've just provided evidence that humans are the most dangerous, not anything else on this planet.
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What are you basing this on? History. We have had a period of adaptation and experimentation with every other invention in history. This one likely will be no different. > Won't it just be used to augment the amount of harm that humans can do? Sure, but that's everything that makes us more capable. It also makes us more able to defend and create.
>History Right, I learned from Napoleon about the dangers of AI... The large land mammals were doing pretty well too, until a bipedal superintelligence showed up. History is a get thing to learn from and a very poor thing to assume is going to repeat.
You would have more weight behind your words if there was any sort of precedent for AI as it exists today being super intelligent, or that you could make a case for some method by which you could suddenly ramp out of control without our notice.
But as is, all you're doing is making theories, and there's not much of any precedent for any of them.
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
> that quickly outnumber humans in quantity and quality I suggest you respond by enjoying the quality content.
Sorry, was busy plugging my paperclip optimizer into the internet, what's up exactly?
Do you have a paperclip optimizer? No such thing exists, it's science fiction
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Other than snark, do you have a good argument? We know that technology can be error-prone, and LLMs fail in a great plethora of ways, but you are trying to sell an AI Doom narrative. I have never bought the idea that AI will be airgapped, because the whole paradigm of Yudkowsky at al. is ludicrous and even within it airgapping was a strawman of a technique (they argue that a truly dangerous AI will get itself out reg…
> Maybe this is a good cause to reassess the premise of alignment as a valuable goal? Could you elaborate here? Alignment seems pretty obviously a good thing.
Alignment assumes a well agreed foundational philosophy on what is good, what is fair, what is doable today and tomorrow. Yes, HN contributors might have shared goals for AGI alignment—but we are not the world—-we are a thin slice of one culture.
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#56Can’t wait for this to land in langchain!
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#57Don't worry folks, the years and years of "of course we'd never connect experimental AI systems to the open internet" assurances were never necessary for safe development and deployment. This reassessment was founded on the last several months that showed us these systems are close to 100% dependable, they never deceive humans, they are entirely aligned with human morals (you know, all those morals we all agree on),…
I agree with this assessment 100%. We are asking for trouble with this sort of thing.
I wrote my own thoughts on the subject on a couple of other threads:
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35274017 - on an article on (Google) Bard
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35020806 - on an article about a tool called Self-Learning Agent for Performing APIs (SLAPA)
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#58Harambe tried to warn us
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
>History Right, I learned from Napoleon about the dangers of AI... The large land mammals were doing pretty well too, until a bipedal superintelligence showed up. History is a get thing to learn from and a very poor thing to assume is going to repeat.
You would have more weight behind your words if there was any sort of precedent for AI as it exists today being super intelligent, or that you could make a case for some method by which you could suddenly ramp out of control without our notice. But as is, all you're doing is making theories, and there's not much of any precedent for any of them.
> that you could make a case for some method by which you could suddenly ramp out of control without our notice.
lots of things ramp up without our notice. Like CO2 in the atmosphere, or Ozone depleting chemicals, or PFAS in the water, microplastics in the ocean. I don't think it's a small list.
Re: Gorilla: Large Language Model connected with massive APIs
#60If people are surpassing GPT4 with finetuned Llama-7B, this is the end for NotOpenAI's parade
It’s clickbait. The page clearly says API related. Scummy approach to wording but totally expected.
it is accurate, their trained model does surpass GPT4 and Claude. Which means someone can beat GTP4 in specific applications with a model that runs in an old graphics card