Live data from Hacker News

The tiny corp raised $5.1M

geohot.github.io

91–100 of 331 posts

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#91
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

George Hotz is a talented engineer but he absolutely does not have the social science background to "fix" Twitter.

You don’t need a social science background to fix Twitter.

I think abnormal psychology or perhaps criminology would be helpful in understanding the current Twitter decision making process.

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#92
post #77

Why wouldn't AMD throw a few million at this? Worst case they lose a small amount of money, but best case they finally get good software for their hardware. The past decade or so, they haven't been able to create any good software for their hardware. They made small improvements but the competition, Nvidia, has also made improvements to their already good software. It too the point where their software is the reason…

AFAIK the "AMDs drivers are bad" meme is outdated. Sure, their AI/ML software is garbage, but the graphics drivers are fine.

I just had my AMD-based machine crash - repeatedly - every time I tried to use Google Maps inside Firefox for longer than a few minutes.

I haven't confirmed, but I strongly assume that either their graphics drivers or something Ubuntu does with Wayland are not fine.

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#93

For background, "geohot", is George Hotz, who's a known hacker / tech personality[0] This project fits the pattern of his previous projects: he gets excited about the currently hot thing in tech, makes his own knockoff version, generates a ton of buzz in the tech press for it, and then it fizzles out because he doesn't have the resources or attention span to actually make something at that scale. In 2016, Tesla and s…

Comma didn't fizzle out. https://twitter.com/comma_ai/status/1578517666632900608

They're slowing burning through their VC money trying to make a business out of the hobbyist market while Cruise and Waymo have fully autonomous cars deployed in SF and are scaling up.

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#94
> The human brain has about 20 PFLOPS of compute.

Where is this number coming from? The number of spikes per second?

Edit: doing a quick search, it doesn’t seem like there’s a consensus on the order of magnitude of this. Here’s a summary of various estimates: https://aiimpacts.org/brain-performance-in-flops/

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#95

For background, "geohot", is George Hotz, who's a known hacker / tech personality[0] This project fits the pattern of his previous projects: he gets excited about the currently hot thing in tech, makes his own knockoff version, generates a ton of buzz in the tech press for it, and then it fizzles out because he doesn't have the resources or attention span to actually make something at that scale. In 2016, Tesla and s…

You're creating a false narrative man. Him creating tinygrad makes sense given he created a self-driving car company which leverages deep learning (and now uses tinygrad in prod, go figure).

It's not like he decided to hop from self-driving cars to 'AI' because fads changed.

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#96

For background, "geohot", is George Hotz, who's a known hacker / tech personality[0] This project fits the pattern of his previous projects: he gets excited about the currently hot thing in tech, makes his own knockoff version, generates a ton of buzz in the tech press for it, and then it fizzles out because he doesn't have the resources or attention span to actually make something at that scale. In 2016, Tesla and s…

He has been working on tinygrad since atleast 2021. https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2021/06/13/a-bre...

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wasn’t even fixing Twitter. It was marginally improving search.

From the actual engineers that were posting on Twitter marginal is putting it lightly. The quality, arrogance and ignorance of enterprise SDLC was akin to that of a 1st year grad.

It was so painful watching self-proclaimed tech geniuses displaying the same moronic attitude I had at 22

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#98
He claims there's a $999 AMD card that gives 123 TFLOPS, and his tinybox will cost $15k for 738 TFLOPS. In other words, the tinybox will have 6 of these GPUs, eg $6000 cost price. It seems a steep markup from 6k to 15k, and if the software is open-source, i'm not sure why you wouldn't build your own? Or is it worth 9k for a custom motherboard that can fit so many GPUs. Or can you buy 6-GPU motherboards off the shelf? Just curious what people think. Not being disparaging, kudos to geohot :)

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#99

For background, "geohot", is George Hotz, who's a known hacker / tech personality[0] This project fits the pattern of his previous projects: he gets excited about the currently hot thing in tech, makes his own knockoff version, generates a ton of buzz in the tech press for it, and then it fizzles out because he doesn't have the resources or attention span to actually make something at that scale. In 2016, Tesla and s…

He has been working on tinygrad since atleast 2021. https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2021/06/13/a-bre...

AI was already red hot in 2021, so not sure that detracts from OP's point.

I know it seems like ages ago at the current pace, but ya gotta remember that GPT-3 was released in mid-2020.

Re: The tiny corp raised $5.1M

#100
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AFAIK the "AMDs drivers are bad" meme is outdated. Sure, their AI/ML software is garbage, but the graphics drivers are fine.

The cutting edge for graphics is all raytracing, and Nvidia still dominates. DLSS3, pathtracing, etc, these are for 'graphics', but heavily dependent on AI post processing, so Nvidia still rules. So in the gaming market, Nvidia still commands a huge premium. No AMD card can play Cyberpunk on overdrive 4k.

> The cutting edge for graphics is all raytracing, and Nvidia still dominates. DLSS3, pathtracing, etc, these are for 'graphics', but heavily dependent on AI post processing, so Nvidia still rules.

IMHO, unless you have a $1000+ GPU, RayTracing is still not worth the performance hit. I prefer playing at 100+ FPS with RayTracing off, than turning it on and have my frame rate cut in half.

Post reply on HN