If they can achieve something competitive with CUDA for $5m, why hasn't AMD done it yet?
It’s really as simple as that and it still hasn’t changed so nvidia is dominating them in AI as a result.
11–20 of 331 posts
If they can achieve something competitive with CUDA for $5m, why hasn't AMD done it yet?
It’s really as simple as that and it still hasn’t changed so nvidia is dominating them in AI as a result.
True entrepreneur. Having a vision and ignoring naysayers. Go George!
what does he mean by "tape out" chips?
what does he mean by "tape out" chips?
If they can achieve something competitive with CUDA for $5m, why hasn't AMD done it yet?
what does he mean by "tape out" chips?
If they can achieve something competitive with CUDA for $5m, why hasn't AMD done it yet?
AMD/ATI has always been terrible at drivers/software for their GPUs going back decades. It’s really as simple as that and it still hasn’t changed so nvidia is dominating them in AI as a result.
Can anyone comment on the TinyBox they are taking preorders for? The tinybox 738 FP16 TFLOPS 144 GB GPU RAM 5.76 TB/s RAM bandwidth 30 GB/s model load bandwidth (big llama loads in around 4 seconds) AMD EPYC CPU 1600W (one 120V outlet) Runs 65B FP16 LLaMA out of the box (using tinygrad, subject to software development risks) $15,000
Don't waste your money.
Buy 6 RTX 4090's and a decent ECC-memory server, and call it a day.