Live data from Hacker News

Update on Sharing

about.netflix.com

31–40 of 325 posts

Re: Update on Sharing

#31
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea that was floated was that they identify a device that defines the household (e.g. a TV), for example based on being always on the same SSID, or being on a wired connection, or the IP address. Then other devices need to be in the same network as that stable device at least say once a month.

Can I have my other households VPN to my local network to bypass this?

Yeah.

Re: Update on Sharing

#33

Honestly, I wouldn't have minded something like "buy an extra member" if it were introduced years ago. Introducing it now just seems to be a trigger to re-evaluate "is Netflix really worth that much" at a time their content selection doesn't look as amazing as it once did. I'm coming from a background of having recently cancelled my account though, and may be biased in thinking along those lines as a result. Overall…

> at a time their content selection doesn't look as amazing as it once did

I feel like Netflix is seasonal. Just like Disney+ and HBO.

Come fall Netflix will debut a bunch of viral bangers, and by February you'll be questioning if Netflix is worth it again.

Re: Update on Sharing

#35

My daughters have been freeloading on our Netflix even though WE TOLD THEM NOT TO DO THAT. So now they'll get booted off without us having to be the bad parents texting them that we want to use it now. No complaints from me.

change your password?

Re: Update on Sharing

#36

I really dislike how every corporate communication regarding an “update” now means “here’s how we’re making things worse for you.” I know honesty has never really been the fundamental value of public relations initiatives, but it would be refreshing to occasionally see a company saying that they’re putting the squeeze on customers because they need to protect their margins or even just because they can. The formerly-…

> ... "To better serve our customers, here's how we're making things worse for you.

FTFY.

Re: Update on Sharing

#37

Ahoy there, mateys! I be here to say that I be leaving Netflix. They be raising their prices too high, and they be taking away all the good shows. I be sailin' the high seas for my entertainment now. Arrrr!

I should think so too on a farmer's wages

Re: Update on Sharing

#38
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea that was floated was that they identify a device that defines the household (e.g. a TV), for example based on being always on the same SSID, or being on a wired connection, or the IP address. Then other devices need to be in the same network as that stable device at least say once a month.

Can I have my other households VPN to my local network to bypass this?

Not if they’re looking at SSID.

But if that’s really the case you can just use the same SSID on both places, and maybe use the same IP address space and router MAC. If they’re fingerprinting the home network that should do pretty good?

Re: Update on Sharing

#39
Anyone have a writeup on using TailScale to bypass these sorts of limits?

Some folks have said it includes SSID as a check which is definitely a wrinkle. I would have assumed it was mostly just using IP address.

This is one of those cases where the War Against General Purpose Computing is going to own society, score points against users. I assume if you can root & run Magisk you could fake a geolocation for example. But Google & Apple have done everything in their power to make rooted/jailbroken devices practically unusable, to build attestation frameworks & SafetyNet & other systems to make sure corporate payloads run safe from user-agency on devices. What a shitty future!

Re: Update on Sharing

#40
We are back to the cable days. We know the likely outcome for this: increase in piracy. I do not advocate for this (not even a Netflix user myself) but they have forgotten about one of the motivations that allowed the streaming business to flourish, "cable cutting" for minimizing costs.
Post reply on HN