Live data from Hacker News

Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-Based Manipulation of Images

vcai.mpi-inf.mpg.de

11–20 of 90 posts

Re: Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-Based Manipulation of Images

#11
post #9
post #5

Hello, post-truth world! More seriously, I think that digital photos, and especially low-res surveillance camera coverage, will soon be inadmissible in any reasonable court, because tools like this would allow to forge such evidence in very natural-looking ways.

There are probably ways to embed cryptographic hashes within images. Any device that creates images from the real world could have secret keys that can be used to validate any image created by said device. We will still need a centralized party that holds the secret keys for validation through

This is the right approach, but there’s lots of complexity around transcoding. In the courtroom that’s less of an issue if you can get the original unmodified outputs, but broader applications need to think through what it means to be “verified”

Re: Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-Based Manipulation of Images

#15
The semantic understanding feels much richer than diffusion based modeling, e.g. the trees on the shore growing to match the manipulated reflection, the sun changing shape as it's moved up on the horizon, the horse's leg following proper biomechanics as its position is changed. I haven't gotten such a cohesive world model when doing text-guided in-painting with stable diffusion etc. This feels like it could very conceivably be guided by an animation rig with temporally consistent results.

Re: Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-Based Manipulation of Images

#17
post #9
post #5

Hello, post-truth world! More seriously, I think that digital photos, and especially low-res surveillance camera coverage, will soon be inadmissible in any reasonable court, because tools like this would allow to forge such evidence in very natural-looking ways.

There are probably ways to embed cryptographic hashes within images. Any device that creates images from the real world could have secret keys that can be used to validate any image created by said device. We will still need a centralized party that holds the secret keys for validation through

What shall we do with millions upon millions of existing mobile phones, and also surveillance cameras and dashcams?

Some of them possibly could be updated, but this will take time. Securing the keys within them is also going to be a problem; not all of them have a TPM.

Re: Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-Based Manipulation of Images

#18
post #5

Hello, post-truth world! More seriously, I think that digital photos, and especially low-res surveillance camera coverage, will soon be inadmissible in any reasonable court, because tools like this would allow to forge such evidence in very natural-looking ways.

Seeing how slowly laws move, the cynic says it's: should be inadmissible in any reasonable court, but will continue to be admissible, and will take a major set of incidents for changes to be enacted across many countries.

Yes. The story if admissable DNA evidence is instructive and terrifying.

https://daily.jstor.org/forensic-dna-evidence-can-lead-wrong...

Re: Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-Based Manipulation of Images

#20
post #13

Demo video: https://twitter.com/_akhaliq/status/1659424744490377217

Longer video with more examples from one of the paper authors: https://twitter.com/XingangP/status/1659483374174584832

Looks like it can't keep the background stable, so I guess this is not suitable for animations.
Post reply on HN