Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 94 posts

Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

#1
Every once in a while I see an article that seems to claim that Moore's Law is over, or slowing down, or about to be over. Then I see some counter-claim, that no, if you account for added cores, or GPUs, or some other third thing, that actually it's still right on track. This cycle has repeated every year for like the past 10 years, but the last few years feel like things have really started to slow down. Maybe that was partially illusory with the chip slowdown from the pandemic, but I figure now that we're several years out we should be able to say for sure.

It also seems like a pretty important question to answer because it has big implications for the advancement of AI technology which has everyone so freaked out.

So what's the consensus around here? Is Moore's Law actually over yet, or not?

Re: Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

#2
No, it is not over (yet). The node is nonsense. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9150552 DOI: 10.1109/MSPEC.2020.9150552

Edit: I have no idea why anyone would downvote a link to this article. It directly answers the question with a decent level of technical detail. We are nowhere near single atom sized features yet, despite what node names might lead you to believe. There's still quite a ways to go.

Re: Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

#3
General purpose CPUs can only get so good. With that said, there are still many advancements that can be made to shrink die sizes and/or shove more transistors more closely together (3D is hard due to heat… but…).

I’m excited about photon-based processors, but until that’s a reality we still have a ton of headway for application-specific scaling.

If you rip specific loops out of a general purpose CPU, there are still plenty of gains to be made!

Re: Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

#4
Nvidia thinks that Moore's Law is dead. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/09/do-expensive-nvidia-g...

Intel, by contrast, says that Moore's Law is still alive. But Intel is technologically behind, and it is easier to improve when there is someone to learn from, so maybe there is a wall that they haven't yet hit.

Regardless, it is a very different law than when I was young, when code just magically got faster each year. Now we can run more and more things at once, but the timing for an individual single-threaded computation hasn't really improved in the last 15 years.

Re: Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

#5
In its original form as in "transistors double every two years" it certainly already seems over. Apple silicon is at 5mn today, and Intel claims they'll conquer 3mn by 2030, so even these facts and theoretical statements already don't fit anymore.

We'll probably have a couple more innovations and might get to making a transistor out of a single atom (silicon atom is 0.262nm; carbon atom is 0.3).

5nm / (2*2*2*2) =~ 0.3

So I don't think we're done making faster hardware just yet, but we're certainly getting to the boundaries of what appears to be physically possible.

Re: Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

#7
Dead, but we're heading into new a new paradigm of hardware accelerators (encoders, decoders, AI-optimized chips, multi-die GPUs, ...) and new packaging systems (M1 SoC's, GPU Chiplets, ...), all powered by what was previously the big bottleneck, interconnection within these components (AMD's Infinity Fabric, Apple's UltraFusion, ...)

Re: Ask HN: Is Moore's Law over, or not?

#10
post #5

In its original form as in "transistors double every two years" it certainly already seems over. Apple silicon is at 5mn today, and Intel claims they'll conquer 3mn by 2030, so even these facts and theoretical statements already don't fit anymore. We'll probably have a couple more innovations and might get to making a transistor out of a single atom (silicon atom is 0.262nm; carbon atom is 0.3). 5nm / (2*2*2*2) =~ 0.…

It helps, but isn't a necessity that the size decreases to increase transistor count. You can get bigger and bigger dies / interconnected multi die assemblies too, which is happening if you look at the custom hardware Tesla and others have announced.
Post reply on HN