11–20 of 70 posts
I'm employed by Microsoft, but not in any relation to the authors of this tool or this post. First time I saw github.com/mirosoft/guidance was on the HN front page, actually :) I've been waiting for a tool exactly like guidance, something that lets me compose prompts the way I think about prompts. Langchain was too much of a headache for me. Playing with guidance, it feels like this is how programmatically interactin…
I'm employed by Microsoft, but not in any relation to the authors of this tool or this post. First time I saw github.com/mirosoft/guidance was on the HN front page, actually :) I've been waiting for a tool exactly like guidance, something that lets me compose prompts the way I think about prompts. Langchain was too much of a headache for me. Playing with guidance, it feels like this is how programmatically interactin…
langchain caused more problems than it fixed. Really ugly software.
I'm employed by Microsoft, but not in any relation to the authors of this tool or this post. First time I saw github.com/mirosoft/guidance was on the HN front page, actually :) I've been waiting for a tool exactly like guidance, something that lets me compose prompts the way I think about prompts. Langchain was too much of a headache for me. Playing with guidance, it feels like this is how programmatically interactin…
Open source will be behind always since it is harder to organize a large group of people and once it publishes it will be copied by big players, however if an organization like the original OpenAI gets formed that is truly non-for-profit and support the community, I believe it can beat big players. I think only Meta is the company that can support such an organization at the moment.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
langchain caused more problems than it fixed. Really ugly software.
Please elaborate. So far it seems promising to me, but I started using it just recently.
https://itsbehnam.com/DetachGPT-Switching-to-Open-Source-Unc...
I'm employed by Microsoft, but not in any relation to the authors of this tool or this post. First time I saw github.com/mirosoft/guidance was on the HN front page, actually :) I've been waiting for a tool exactly like guidance, something that lets me compose prompts the way I think about prompts. Langchain was too much of a headache for me. Playing with guidance, it feels like this is how programmatically interactin…
are we going to now invent a programming language that communicates with LLMs? I find that funny
I wish the comparison was with GPT-4 instead of GPT-3.5. When comparing model intelligence, I wish that only the most capable models were compared.
Edit: out of curiosity I posted the meeting summarization example to GPT-4 and indeed it produced both the relevant snippets and the correct answer to the stated question.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
are we going to now invent a programming language that communicates with LLMs? I find that funny
I'm not an LLM, but I am a native English speaker and English is pretty awful for conveying information succinctly. The lengths you must go with prompts to ensure you're getting the right response is extremely similar to the lengths you go to when delegating something to someone or describing requirements to a project. I wonder if whatever language we end up using to "converse" with LLMs would have value within an or…
People already adopt context-specific specialized languages in contexts like that for clarity, what will probably happen is that LLMs will get better at adapting or being adapted to specific contexts.
I'm employed by Microsoft, but not in any relation to the authors of this tool or this post. First time I saw github.com/mirosoft/guidance was on the HN front page, actually :) I've been waiting for a tool exactly like guidance, something that lets me compose prompts the way I think about prompts. Langchain was too much of a headache for me. Playing with guidance, it feels like this is how programmatically interactin…
are we going to now invent a programming language that communicates with LLMs? I find that funny
I wish the comparison was with GPT-4 instead of GPT-3.5. When comparing model intelligence, I wish that only the most capable models were compared.
> While Vicuna is somewhat comparable to ChatGPT (3.5), we believe GPT-4 is a _much_ stronger model, and are excited to see if open source models can approach _that_.