Yeah it bugs me too. I don't disagree with it, I'm not saying she shouldn't have been sent to prison, I'm not saying she should have had a lighter sentence, but it is strange that despite so few female tech founders, one of the first sent to prison was a woman.
Another narrative that might work is: it's hard to be a female founder, so only the most "bold" (in whatever way you want) get investment, and it was precisely this investment that ended up being the reason she is being punished. i.e. as a man it's easier to get investment so men don't have to resort to fraud. Maybe combine that with investors being more likely to be defrauded by a woman because they let their guard down more. I don't know. This narrative is too full of stereotypes and I'm not sure I like it, and I'm sure men have resorted to fraud to get investment, just maybe not as popular. Maybe also add that being a prominent female founder gave her more fame than the average guy in the same role, exacerbating the problem and potentially the punishment?