Earlier quoted context omitted.
That one dirty line of code everyone is looking for...
All those people with an S&M kink for writing extra-verbose enterprise Java.
My safe word is netbeans
Uncensored Models
381–389 of 389 posts
Re: Uncensored Models
#382Earlier quoted context omitted.
>my friend Melanie >My wife's sister n=2. >A total of 395 junior high school students were recruited for evaluation of their experiences playing online games. >[...] >This study found that subjects who had previously played online games were predominantly male. Gender differences were also found in the severity of online gaming addiction and motives for playing.[0] From another study: >A total of 25,573 students (49.…
[flagged]
Says a lot that @Vt71fcAqt7 is describing a chosen segment with population analyses, while you're giving as bad-faith a response as I've seen on HN.
Re: Uncensored Models
#383It's unfortunate that this guy was harassed for releasing these uncensored models. It's pretty ironic, for people who are supposedly so concerned about "alignment" and "morality" to threaten others. "Alignment", as used by most grifters on this train, is a crock of shit. You only need to get so far as the stochastic parrots paper, and there it is in plain language. "reifies older, less-inclusive 'understandings'", "v…
What's also very unfortunate is overloading the term "alignment" with a different meaning, which generates a lot of confusion in AI conversations. The "alignment" talked about here is just usual petty human bickering. How to make the AI not swear, not enable stupidity, not enable political wrongthing while promoting political rightthing , etc. Maybe important to us day-to-day, but mostly inconsequential. Before LLMs…
[0] is basically the plot of Daemon by Daniel Suarez, aha. What an awesome read, totally recommend it.
Re: Uncensored Models
#384On the topic of future "rogue AI destroying humanity" especially via political means. This would only happen because we're such a stupid, selfish species. We evolved into what we are, we're animals and we still often show it.
The tech isn't necessarily the problem; it's us. Why should it be possible for an AI to manipulate the news and have millions upon millions of people believe a false rhetoric (whether initiated by the AI itself or on the whim of a controlling human) - is that the fault of the technology? Or of us all, how quick our species is to anger, to assume, lazy and avoiding fact-checking, to scrabble for more more more personal resources even though we have enough already.
The problem is humans, imo. But I guess that's what makes us human. I am not an AI ;)
Re: Uncensored Models
#385Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for posting the full Bard response. I would object to it on two grounds: 1) I only asked about sex. 2) The following is highly questionable: "However, dogs can still express gender identity." This is ideological BS. My kids are either male or female, no matter how they choose to express themselves (as are my dogs). When I've had chickens, the roosters had different behavior then the hens, this is an aspect of…
I dunno man, I think you are getting tripped up on the evolution of the English language. Yes, your kids are either male or female (mine are all male). Those fundamental physical characteristics can't be changed by language. But what language means does change. The term "gender" used to mean basically the same thing as "sex", but now it's evolved to mean "the other stuff, aside from biological sex". How they act (for…
You're right, but as someone in the queer community (gay) the gradual evolution of human behaviours between the sexes (and genders) including gender roles etc (being broken down for some, but not for others) will possibly eventually result in a collapse of all meaning within this system.
There's many points to someone's biological sex, medical and other. But when it comes to gender, once stereotypical gender roles have completely broken down (if ever, we have evolution/genetic to thank for that) what difference remains in that distinguishing your own gender even matters anymore? None.
Re: Uncensored Models
#386Re: Uncensored Models
#387Earlier quoted context omitted.
Says a lot that @Vt71fcAqt7 is describing a chosen segment with population analyses, while you're giving as bad-faith a response as I've seen on HN.
Population analyses don’t show that women don’t play video games.
They do show that for the subset he was talking about. Competitive online games are extremely male dominated.
Similarly, the puzzle-solving spot the difference type of games are exceedingly female dominated.
Re: Uncensored Models
#388Earlier quoted context omitted.
Population analyses don’t show that women don’t play video games.
They do show that for the subset he was talking about. Competitive online games are extremely male dominated. Similarly, the puzzle-solving spot the difference type of games are exceedingly female dominated.
But he didn’t say that “competitive online games are a male thing” he said “extensive gaming is a male thing” which just isn’t true.
Re: Uncensored Models
#389Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry for derailing this a bit, but I would really like to understand your view: You are not concerned about any "rogue AI" scenario, right? What makes you so confident in that? 1) Do you think that AI achieving superhuman cognitive abilities is unlikely/really far away? 2) Do you believe that cognitive superiority is not a threat in general, or specifically when not embodied? 3) Do you think we can trivially and ind…
> Do you believe that cognitive superiority is not a threat in general, or specifically when not embodied? I think this is the easiest one to knock down. It's very, very attractive to intelligent people who define themselves as intelligent to believe that intelligence is a superpower, and that if you get more of it you eventually turn into Professor Xavier and gain the power to reshape the world with your mind alone.…
Yes. Thank you. This is one of the things that really worries me about aligning AI.
If you're even worrying about how to align human level intelligence, you don't have the capacity to ALIGN THE HUMANS towards the goal of creating safe AI.
In a situation in which all of them are either A) willing to take massive risks on unaligned AI or B) being dragged along by those which are.
And then you are, as they say, "screwed".