Sam Altman isn’t the answer to regulating artificial intelligence

justrealist wrote: post #6

stephc_int13 wrote: post #3

Sam Altman is as much the answer to regulating AI as SBF was the answer to regulating crypto.

[flagged]

Disagree. They are serving similar structural roles(although I highly doubt OpenAI is a scam). While it could be expanded in depth, it points the similarity out...

Re: Sam Altman isn’t the answer to regulating artificial intelligence

#9

Post by bionhoward » Wed, May 17, 2023, 7:03 PM UTC

notyourwork wrote: post #5

bionhoward wrote: post #4

[flagged]

Is Sam Altman the answer to regulating AI? If yes, why?

If you want an effective solution to regulate AI, then it makes sense to involve more than one person, because the task is beyond the capability of any one person, because it’s controlled and used by billions of people. Wittgenstein rolls in his grave at this one, lol

Re: Sam Altman isn’t the answer to regulating artificial intelligence

#10

Post by mrcode007 » Wed, May 17, 2023, 7:05 PM UTC

justrealist wrote: post #6

stephc_int13 wrote: post #3

Sam Altman is as much the answer to regulating AI as SBF was the answer to regulating crypto.

[flagged]

He actually used a notable rhetorical device that is used to evoke images in your mind without having to describe them. Definitely not a quip and not mindless.