U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
theintercept.com
U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
1–10 of 268 posts
Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#2[flagged]
Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#3[flagged]
And what's the difference? Does that make it okay?
Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#4[flagged]
Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#5[flagged]
you might want to read the article again
Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#6Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#7This discussion might benefit from distinguishing several issues:
(1) the propriety of protesting abortions at all
(2) the propriety of protesting anything in a manner that seems to threaten violence
(3) the government's use of Dataminr
Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#8Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#9From the article, "the agency had cast such a broad surveillance net that large volumes of innocuous First Amendment-protected activity regularly got swept up as potential security threats."
This is funded by unlimited federal deficit spending. Let's reduce their budgets.
Re: U.S. Marshals Spied on Abortion Protesters Using Dataminr
#10This discussion might benefit from distinguishing several issues: (1) the propriety of protesting abortions at all (2) the propriety of protesting anything in a manner that seems to threaten violence (3) the government's use of Dataminr
(1) is made irrelevant in the most iron clad way by the First Amendment.