61–65 of 65 posts
Congrats on the launch! We built something similar a few months ago but couldn't get the quality of the SQL generation to be that good without providing a ton of few-shot examples, especially with databases that contained more bespoke data. If you have enough few-shot examples the quality might be quite good!
This is great, but how is your performance on multi-table joins? We've been working on a homebrew solution using OpenAI internally conditioned on our schema, and can't bridge the multi-table gap. Also I'm skeptical if this generalizes, do you have measures in place to prevent query hallucination?
It's against HN's rules to have promotional upvotes and/or comments in the threads. Especially not promotional comments. I suppose your friends were just trying to help you out, but HN users are acutely sensitive to this and consider it spamming. They're not entirely wrong, either, because the upvotes and comments we're talking about were not organic. We want genuine, curious conversation here, and this is not that.…
It's against HN's rules to have promotional upvotes and/or comments in the threads. Especially not promotional comments. I suppose your friends were just trying to help you out, but HN users are acutely sensitive to this and consider it spamming. They're not entirely wrong, either, because the upvotes and comments we're talking about were not organic. We want genuine, curious conversation here, and this is not that.…
Thanks for sharing how you keep the discussion quality high here. We responded to some thought-provoking questions on this thread about differentiation vs ChatGPT, other SQL Copilots, edge cases like more complicated queries etc. that we believe other HN users and makers in this space will benefit from. As I responded in @chatmasta's vouch (thank you!), we're data and software engineering experts, and happy to provid…
I'm not talking about the replies you posted; I'm talking about top-level comments that appeared to be organic and actually weren't.
If you didn't ask friends/fans/users to upvote or comment, or pass a link around (which is usually interpreted as such a request), then someone else did. No doubt they were trying to "help" you. Whoever it was, they need to understand that on HN, it doesn't help, it hurts. It's against HN's rules and we ban accounts and sites that do it. It's also something that the community here is extremely vigilant about and considers spamming.
If you don't want to get banned, and/or flagged and flamed by HN users, you should make sure this doesn't happen again.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
According to docs it only takes in your data schema and outputs the SQL query to run, so the AI model doesn't actually get information about your data, just the schema. Otherwise data is handled according to SOC II principles similar to any other BI tools.
Doesn't this penalize the tool though? Knowing the amount of data in a table is still important to determine the type of query, even more to optimize it