I like the concept of repairability, but these headphones are honestly quite boring. “Fair” cannot be the only selling point. Offer something interesting and compelling.
Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
71–80 of 239 posts
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#72It would be interesting to know if t would be viable to make these for the lower end market…. Or would consumers just replace them anyway?
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#73I stopped reading at “Vegan Leather”. Can we call it what it is? Plastic.
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#74I stopped reading at “Vegan Leather”. Can we call it what it is? Plastic.
Why dont we call leather what it is - chemically treated skin Because we're allowed to put words to new uses Language is open-source
I’ve no idea what “vegan leather” is. Plastic, some sort of plant material, something else?
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
WH-1000XM5 => $400 Bose QC45 => $279 Fairbuds XL => 249€ ($272 if I convert right now) It's cheaper than two of the most popular headphones, how is there a "too high sustainability tax" ?!?
But what's the sound quality like? If they're in the price range of $300-400 premium headphones, but perform like $100 headphones, that's still a "tax".
The vast amount of Bluetooth NC headphones sound like their 100$ wired counterpart.
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#76I like the idea, but they look a little big to be called "buds".
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#77Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#78I like the concept of repairability, but these headphones are honestly quite boring. “Fair” cannot be the only selling point. Offer something interesting and compelling.
It's good as a starting point though. It inspires similar ideas to hit the market and gives consumers a taste of sustainability.
This seems somewhat like a solution looking for a problem.
Probably the price surcharge for these headphones would be better spent on right-to-repair lobbying or even spent at ifixit.
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#79One of the problems with headphones is that the cups tend to deteriorate over time - maybe sweat or the oil from the skin or something reacts with it and it starts to peel. After a few years, the cups are no longer available for that model and so you end up having to buy a new one.
I got the impression that they've had phone parts in stock for a very long time, but of course that's relative to the average phone age and I don't know how many years you'd be expecting. In this case, though, if you already know what you'll need ahead of time... that's a cheap thing to just keep in a drawer. Can't go out of stock if you already have them and thereby double the other parts' longevity.
Re: Fairbuds XL review: noise-cancelling headphones you can fix
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why dont we call leather what it is - chemically treated skin Because we're allowed to put words to new uses Language is open-source
I know what leather is. I’ve no idea what “vegan leather” is. Plastic, some sort of plant material, something else?