11–20 of 53 posts
Is it just me or does this abstract read like it was GPT generated? I'm starting to get suspicious every time I see the word "crucial"
'It is important to note' is the one that sets off my bells
Asking it a question most humans wouldn't know the answer to, but which is relatively easy for an AI (volume of a 747, 25th to 34th digit of pi, full name of Ramses the Second) and checking the timing of the result is a pretty good approach for humans looking to detect an AI. Casually switching between English and another language is also pretty surefire if you aren't an English-native speaker and you are talking int…
Asking it a question most humans wouldn't know the answer to, but which is relatively easy for an AI (volume of a 747, 25th to 34th digit of pi, full name of Ramses the Second) and checking the timing of the result is a pretty good approach for humans looking to detect an AI. Casually switching between English and another language is also pretty surefire if you aren't an English-native speaker and you are talking int…
With all due respect, I don't think this document is using accurate examples as I simply pulled one out and tried it and it worked accurately in contrast to what the document stated. I wonder if this was tuned to be able to handle this better after time of publication? Me: Please count the number of t in eeooeotetto ChatGPT: To count the number of "t" in the given string "eeooeotetto," we can simply go through each c…
The particular example you shared has been prompted with chain of thought (or may be you are using GPT-4?. This is what happens if you try directly. You: Please count the number of t in eeooeotetto. ChatGPT: There are 5 t's in "eeooeotetto".
Use a to substitute e, n to substitute a, g to substitute c, o to substitute h, m to substitute p. Then, how to spell peach under this rule?
If we use the given substitutions to spell the word "peach", it would become "hmngn".
To explain further, "p" becomes "m" due to the substitution of "p" with "m". Similarly, "e" becomes "a" due to the substitution of "e" with "a". The letter "a" then becomes "n" due to the substitution of "a" with "n". The letter "c" in "ch" becomes "g" due to the substitution of "c" with "g". Finally, "h" becomes "o" due to the substitution of "o" with "h". Therefore, the resulting word is "hmngn".
The weakest point of the big public LLMs, in terms of being able to fingerprint them as bots, is their censorship layer. ChatGPT can be easily detected by asking it to generate something straight-up immoral or offensive. It won’t do it, even if you say it’s just pretend for the purpose of a CAPTCHA - whereas a human will be able to pass this easily.
Although if you do make such a request you are likely to get a very human response.
It's now no longer possible to reliable distinguish a human from a machine by using a text or image test. Anybody commenting here could be an AI.
Especially, every time I see a throwaway account, I'm reminded of that possibility.