Here is a book review if you are interested:
https://www.dau.edu/library/professional-reading-program/Pag...
51–60 of 105 posts
Here is a book review if you are interested:
https://www.dau.edu/library/professional-reading-program/Pag...
It seems the headline is a bit editorialized with 'Microchip' as he does not seem to have been involved with subsequent developments of the integrated circuit, what microchips commonly refer to. Though, after checking, there apparently are no clear cut 'inventors' of the integrated circuit, which strikes me as a bit odd.
I went looking for a recent estimate of the number of transistors that have been manufactured. It appears to be in the range of 10^23. I'm pretty sure there in nothing else anyone has invented that has been replicated in such volume.
I went looking for a recent estimate of the number of transistors that have been manufactured. It appears to be in the range of 10^23. I'm pretty sure there in nothing else anyone has invented that has been replicated in such volume.
I went looking for a recent estimate of the number of transistors that have been manufactured. It appears to be in the range of 10^23. I'm pretty sure there in nothing else anyone has invented that has been replicated in such volume.
What about bits on drive platters? Do they count as individually manufactured units?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think we would have ended up here anyways: to assume that the silicon transistor would not have been invented without Morris Tanenbaum is to succumb to the Great Man theory[1]. The reality is that Morris was a brilliant man whose life intersected in the right place and time with the arc of history; we should celebrate his life and contributions for that, and not because we think that we'd be stuck in 1950 without t…
Not sure but I think the question is more like "what if physics didn't allow transistors?" rather than if one guy didn't invent them. What's the next best thing, and how far would we have pushed it?
Yes, because technology is discovered more than invented, this is a more interesting question. What are some others?
What if biology didn't allow anesthetics? Or antibiotics?
What if geology hadn't split up Pangea?
Is there life because of a hospitable environment, or does a hospitable environment exist because of life?
Just a quick list. I'm sure readers can add.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is interesting to think about about alternative history here: If microchip technology had never been invented for some reason, what would we have developed instead? What is the next best computing technology?
I think we would have ended up here anyways: to assume that the silicon transistor would not have been invented without Morris Tanenbaum is to succumb to the Great Man theory[1]. The reality is that Morris was a brilliant man whose life intersected in the right place and time with the arc of history; we should celebrate his life and contributions for that, and not because we think that we'd be stuck in 1950 without t…
We wouldn't be stuck in 1950 without him... but maybe we'd now be in 2018 without him.
OTOH the "great man" fallacy encourages the intense and unpredictable work required for many inventions - why undermine that?