31–40 of 65 posts
This seems like spam. The blog is mostly ChatGPT generated content by authors who have no bio's or profile pictures. The pricing is absolutely out of this world. Particularly if you consider that most of the legwork is done by the OpenAI API anyway.
This seems like spam. The blog is mostly ChatGPT generated content by authors who have no bio's or profile pictures. The pricing is absolutely out of this world. Particularly if you consider that most of the legwork is done by the OpenAI API anyway.
I haven't investigated the blog or pricing, but I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. I don't think this post should be flagged, so I've vouched for it (although I think my vouching powers were nerfed a long time ago, so hopefully someone else will vouch for it too).
EDIT: I actually don't even see the vouch button. Paging @dang
This seems like spam. The blog is mostly ChatGPT generated content by authors who have no bio's or profile pictures. The pricing is absolutely out of this world. Particularly if you consider that most of the legwork is done by the OpenAI API anyway.
The submitter is active in the comments and has a long history of submissions related to similar ideas. That seems to indicate to me that this is a real project and an iteration on a premise they've been thinking about for a long time. I do notice even their comments follow a suspiciously GPT-like template with three bullet points. But even if they're using GPT to generate the comments and blog posts, is that really…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The submitter is active in the comments and has a long history of submissions related to similar ideas. That seems to indicate to me that this is a real project and an iteration on a premise they've been thinking about for a long time. I do notice even their comments follow a suspiciously GPT-like template with three bullet points. But even if they're using GPT to generate the comments and blog posts, is that really…
[flagged]
I've had my account since 2012 so feel free to investigate and decide for yourself. I don't know the submitter and have zero affiliation with the product (although my startup does happen to be in a similar space). I'm just sympathetic to someone posting a Show HN and getting flagged based on pure speculation.
Regarding their comment activity: they have comments from earlier this year discussing the same topic (GPT for SQL), and they've previously submitted links to articles and products related to data management.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> Are you in on this spam campaign also? I've had my account since 2012 so feel free to investigate and decide for yourself. I don't know the submitter and have zero affiliation with the product (although my startup does happen to be in a similar space). I'm just sympathetic to someone posting a Show HN and getting flagged based on pure speculation. Regarding their comment activity: they have comments from earlier th…
Also FYI - there is no vouch button on HN, which hat did you pull that out of?
Oh, and how convenient that your profile is all about SQL also. Just a happy little coincidence isn't it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Are you in on this spam campaign also? I've had my account since 2012 so feel free to investigate and decide for yourself. I don't know the submitter and have zero affiliation with the product (although my startup does happen to be in a similar space). I'm just sympathetic to someone posting a Show HN and getting flagged based on pure speculation. Regarding their comment activity: they have comments from earlier th…
Stop writing nonsense please. First he is a reputable submitter with a lot of submissions and now all of a sudden it is about you? Also FYI - there is no vouch button on HN, which hat did you pull that out of? Oh, and how convenient that your profile is all about SQL also. Just a happy little coincidence isn't it?
> now all of a sudden it is about you?
Am I missing something? You accused me of being affiliated with the person you accused of being a spammer. You made it about me; I'm simply defending myself.
> there is no vouch button on HN, which hat did you pull that out of?
There is a vouch button for flagged comments, and also for some submissions. I can literally see "vouch" links next to [dead] submissions in /new. So I "pulled it out of" my extensive history interacting with the site.
> how convenient that your profile is all about SQL
That shouldn't be surprising to you based on the fact I acknowledged it in my earlier comment. The fact I have a SQL-related startup is the reason I clicked on the Show HN in the first place.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stop writing nonsense please. First he is a reputable submitter with a lot of submissions and now all of a sudden it is about you? Also FYI - there is no vouch button on HN, which hat did you pull that out of? Oh, and how convenient that your profile is all about SQL also. Just a happy little coincidence isn't it?
Relax. > now all of a sudden it is about you? Am I missing something? You accused me of being affiliated with the person you accused of being a spammer. You made it about me; I'm simply defending myself. > there is no vouch button on HN, which hat did you pull that out of? There is a vouch button for flagged comments, and also for some submissions. I can literally see "vouch" links next to [dead] submissions in /new.…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Relax. > now all of a sudden it is about you? Am I missing something? You accused me of being affiliated with the person you accused of being a spammer. You made it about me; I'm simply defending myself. > there is no vouch button on HN, which hat did you pull that out of? There is a vouch button for flagged comments, and also for some submissions. I can literally see "vouch" links next to [dead] submissions in /new.…
[flagged]
You did, when you accused me of being a shill. (Perhaps the resulting toxicity is precisely the reason why there is a rule against accusing someone of being a shill.)