Live data from Hacker News

Bard now open to use

bard.google.com

261–267 of 267 posts

Re: Bard now open to use

#261

I asked it what ports `nmap -sn` and `nmap -F` scan. It correctly stated that `-sn` does not scan ports. It then stated that `-F` also uses a ping scan (false) and does not scan any ports (also false). When I quoted the man page on -F, it said this: > You're right. The nmap man page does say that `nmap -F` scans fewer ports than the default scan. However, it does not say that `nmap -F` scans any ports at all. 1. It's…

The "arguing" is weird, but I'll note that I've had very similar conversations with ChatGPT where it hallucinated options to commands, gave them wrong meanings, "corrected" itself in a further wrong direction, etc.

It really seems to depend on the subject matter.

I bet we'll eventually see more specialized AIs that are really only good within their subject matter domain.

Re: Bard now open to use

#262
post #235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you tried phind.com? Besides Codeium (vscode extension) this is my goto for code questions. They have some magic sauce, always better than bing, sometimes I go back to gpt4 just to say hey, and for times where i want to save a thread...

With their default model it did extremely badly with my question to build this script. It wasn't even close to right. When I changed it to "Use Best Model" it gave a very good response but I'm pretty certain it was just piped to OpenAI GPT-4. My prompt: Write a python script for me that deletes AMIs from AWS that I own which have the tags role=bento-remote and bento_image_type=profile. It should bucket the AMIs by an…

My hunch is that they combine it with some kind of web crawl and index for source reference, I've used both gpt4 and phind, and find phind better for tasks like api exploration and questions for typical sample programs and error messages for that reason.

Re: Bard now open to use

#263

Bard is no where near ChatGPT quality. Not even GPT-3.5. My test was to translate lines of Korean text. The prompt is simple. "Translate these sentences from Korean to English: ". ChatGPT works all the time. Quality isn't great but it works. Bard, on the other hand, gets confused. It simply repeats the Korean text. I need to prompt it again - "I asked for a translation". And then it starts to work correctly.

That’s funny given that OpenAI architecture GPTs, even LLaMA-7B, just do it right even language specification is wrong or reversed(they don’t care the exact letter of instruction asks to translate a piece from a language or to a language!)

Re: Bard now open to use

#264

> Bard isn’t currently supported in your country. Stay tuned! When Google was a startup and even a decade in they managed to treat everyone the same. Today this has went backwards like everything else Google it seems.

[flagged]

You posted this, users flagged it, and then you posted it again. That's not ok - please don't do an end run around the flagging system like that.

Also, please don't post in the flamewar style to HN. That's no doubt why users flagged your comment in the first place. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Re: Bard now open to use

#265
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My current country isn't on that list. Obviously, you're missing well over a hundred countries on that list.

In today’s episode of “people from countries that create nothing whining about not having access to other countries’ technologies”…

I suspect you like watching DVDs and using your Bluetooth headphones while connected to your WiFi?

Re: Bard now open to use

#266
I finally tried it yesterday after using chatgpt for the last few months for help with languages (human and otherwise).

Prompt: can you test me to determine what my spanish level is?

It gave a very convincing response to the kinds of things it would ask (I can't figure out how to get the exact results back in the history like you can with chatgpt). At the end, it said to hit enter on the prompt to get started. I didn't know what it meant so I told it to proceed with the test. The next answer was basically "I'm still learning languages and I can't do that yet".

Today I tried the same prompt again with the hope I could get the exact output for this reply. This time is asked me 5 questions with both the spanish and english translations and told me once I answered the questions it could tell me my level. I'm not even going to go into how WTF that is.

Bard seems to be a LONG WAY from being ready for prime time.

As for bing, I only tried it once and didn't get the results I needed. Is it legit using chatgpt so i should get the same results in both? I guess I need to experiment more with it.

bard's answer today:

Sure, I can help you test your Spanish level. Here are a few questions to get you started:

¿Cómo te llamas? (What is your name?) ¿De dónde eres? (Where are you from?) ¿Cuánto tiempo llevas estudiando español? (How long have you been studying Spanish?) ¿Qué es lo que más te gusta de estudiar español? (What do you like most about studying Spanish?) ¿Qué es lo que más te ha costado aprender de español? (What has been the hardest thing for you to learn in Spanish?) Once you have answered these questions, I can give you a more accurate assessment of your Spanish level.

Re: Bard now open to use

#267

> Bard isn’t currently supported in your country. Stay tuned! Lol, I'm in Germany :D I was wondering where all the people saying the same came from. Apparently not any country with an embargo, that was my theory.

Probably not available anywhere but the US. Maybe UK.

It wasn't opened in MX until their expo but working here now. I think the EU countries just scare google because they keep getting sued for violating their data protection laws
Post reply on HN