Live data from Hacker News

SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

ft.com

101–110 of 149 posts

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The poor and middle class don't have investments. Source: all my co-workers and girlfriend's relatives that meet me with blank stares when I ask if they are saving for their retirement or maxing the company match for the 401k. Not judging that- the reality is somewhere in between they can't afford to do much but stay alive due to inflation and housing costs out of control and that they need to stop getting $7 Dutch B…

This is one thing that terrifies me. I'm sacrificing today to save for tomorrow while the masses are doing the opposite. And in a decade or 3 when I have assets they can out vote me and take it all back via taxes or rules that change the game Some examples are like - I paid off my student debt by not going to coachella or doing optional things (that I observed others doing). They might get it cancelled for free. They…

You can still go to Coachella today. Jeff Bezos did, after all.

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#103
post #74
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not OP but it is often the case around London, UK. Half price isn't an exaggeration! Better cars usually too.

When I was in London a few weeks ago the taxi prices were 2-3x the uber prices. Also they'd tell you to fuck off if they didn't want to take you to that location.

[deleted]

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#105
post #62
post #21

...on around $100B of capital raised. i.e., -39%. Poof! So far. -- For those here who don't know, Masayoshi Son almost lost everything in the dotcom bust of 2000-2002. A single investment saved him from ruin back then: Alibaba. Was that luck or skill? In hindsight, it looks a lot like luck to me. Either way, he's clearly a bet-the-farm-and-actually-can-lose-the-farm kind of guy.

He started from nothing and he's still a billionaire so I wouldn't just dismiss him like that. He's just a different type of businessman who likes making big risky bets.

People on this forum should be very happy a guy like him exists who can efficiently transfer wealth from rich Middle Easterners to employees of tech companies.

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#106
post #77
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet they are evidenced by people driving for Uber. I’ve driven a Prius for Uber and think so fared quite well using the irs mileage deduction rate to offset almost all my revenue and paid nearly no tax, legally and covered actual depreciation. It’s funny to think 10 years of drivers are somehow idiots.

Wait until you find out how much cars are now when you have to replace your car 10 years earlier.

I think I’m already aware. I’m comfortable with my decision. I haven’t driven in 5 years and I still drive my prius and probably have 100k miles left.

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#107

Has anyone seen an analysis of what percentage of economic activity is just redistribution of wealth more adjacent to gambling, compared to economic activity that is more tightly coupled to cost of delivering goods and services? And just in case it’s not obvious: This question comes to mind as I would categorize SoftBank pretty firmly in the gambling niche - at least compared to a local plumber or Uber driver.

I have benefited greatly from the proliferation of internet and app based taxi services.

>compared to economic activity that is more tightly coupled to cost of delivering goods and services?

How do you measure this? Was it possible that the size of Softbank’s investments is what can lead to the possibility of creating two sided markets like Uber?

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Design and implement over engineered solutions to avoid paying minimum wage across dozens of countries seems at least a little sketchy.

One thing uber did well is it helped break a market distortion in markets where you had to buy a badge, but they were supply limited and could sometimes fetch $1M which IMO makes no sense, if someone can do the job they should be allowed to. I'm not saying everything Uber did was great or right, but breaking that insanity is IMO a step of progress. Next we need to ensure gig workers make at least minimum wage after l…

> supply limited and could sometimes fetch $1M which IMO makes no sense, if someone can do the job they should be allowed to.

I mean, it's new york city, there is not enough room for everyone to drive around all day looking for fares. It's also a unionization thing -- a supply cap ensures a good wage for everyone in the club.

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#109
post #71
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sadly, taxis were never both until Uber. Even in Manhattan, getting a taxi at 2am was a crap shoot. I can an Uber in the suburbs at 2am anywhere in the country. That’s neat.

> Even in Manhattan, getting a taxi at 2am was a crap shoot. I can an Uber in the suburbs at 2am anywhere in the country. You certainly can call an uber, yes. Whether they come through or whether they find a suitable reason to cancel on you... that's a crapshoot.

I’ve never been stranded by Uber. Sometimes drivers cancel, but I’ve never been stranded with no drivers as there’s someone else.

Taxis failed very frequently.

I can reliably plan with Uber. Taxis were a crapshoot.

And I’ve never had the credit card reader broken in Uber and it seemed like every taxi had a busted machine.

Re: SoftBank Vision funds post record $39B annual loss

#110
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He started from nothing and he's still a billionaire so I wouldn't just dismiss him like that. He's just a different type of businessman who likes making big risky bets.

People on this forum should be very happy a guy like him exists who can efficiently transfer wealth from rich Middle Easterners to employees of tech companies.

As I've heard it stated elsewhere, startups are an inefficiency between the transfer of wealth from VCs to Bay Area landlords.
Post reply on HN