Live data from Hacker News

Google Pixel Fold

store.google.com

191–200 of 580 posts

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#191

I just don't understand who wants these foldable phones, especially at the $1799 price point. I guess a use case is wealthy frequent travelers who don't want a separate device with a larger screen to watch movies/videos on the go? Someone help me out here.

You answered your question, more real estate. The price is not appealing but to me any smartphone above 300$ is unappealing.

Yup. I definitely see the appeal of having your phone and tablet be the same thing. I'm sure these will get cheaper eventually if they work well.

Not surprised at all by the cost it's a lot different product and very new. There's people paying 1K for normal phones.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#192
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't feel it's absurd. For every product in the market there is a luxury version for people who's insensitive to price (hello LVHM!)... except for phones. If you have all the money in the world the most expensive / exclusive phone you can get is an iPhone, Samsung Fold, or this Pixel Fold.

Vertu has entered the chat: https://vertu.com/collections/signature $118,500 for a diamond-encrusted dumbphone that's still running Symbian, anyone?

How is this company still in business?

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you use your phone an average of 5 hours a day for two years and then throw it in a junk drawer the hardware would cost less than 50cents per hour of use. I don't understand this type of justification. My fridge would cost around $65k for a 15 year lifetime at $0.50/hour. It just seems like a completely meaningless way to judge the value of something.

They're hoping to sell to you based on the value it provides rather than the cost to produce the thing. Classic sales reframing tactic for obscene 500%+ margin products: You should buy this thing far above market rate because it's worth a lot to you, not because it's priced at a realistic BOM + labor + reasonable profit margin.

How is this phone far above market rate? Which competing products with equivalent functionality are far below it?

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#194
139.7mm x 79.5mm Just imagine, they would remove the crap in the middle and sell it for a reasonable price. Finally an android flagship with proper sizing and GrapheneOS.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#195

Funnily, at 7.6" (unfolded) it's less than an inch bigger than a Pixel 7a Pro (6.7"). Why go through this rigmarole of folding when you're barely adding much realestate? I guess that's why I'm not a VP at some BigCo.

The Pixel 7 Pro body is 162.9 x 76.6 mm, giving it an area of 12,478 mm^2. The Pixel Fold body is 139.7 x 158.7 mm, giving it an area of 22,170 mm^2. So the area of the folding phone is almost twice the size! This was surprising to me since, as you say, the diagonal lengths are similar. Of course, it's due to the Fold having a more square shape.

Caveat: this is measuring the size of the phone itself, not the screens, since that was easier to find.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#196

Funnily, at 7.6" (unfolded) it's less than an inch bigger than a Pixel 7a Pro (6.7"). Why go through this rigmarole of folding when you're barely adding much realestate? I guess that's why I'm not a VP at some BigCo.

An inch in aspect ratio is a relatively large change, considering it entails ~70% of an inch in both dimensions. It would be better to compare screen area or vertical and horizontal dimensions separately, to get a clear picture of the difference.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#197
post #17

That's an ambitious price point. Who are they targeting with this?

The most expensive iPhone is $1699, which is a 14 pro max with a whopping 1 TB of storage. With 128gb it’s only $1099. I agree, seems pretty aggressive.

1TB iPhone pro max is $1,600, not $1,700.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#198
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't want to have to lug a tablet everywhere, like some fulltime scribe.

I don't want a crease in my screen, which I've seen on every single one of these used for any length of time.

as a person who has daily driven a fold for almost 2 years the "crease" is a complete non-problem when you are using it. its mostly just people who havent actually used it that complain about it because they heard some influencer complaining about it or they saw a picture someone took of it with a studio light blasting down on it at the perfect angle.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#199
post #187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm never going back. I only type and respond to things unfolded, I have big hands and the split keyboard + bigger buttons are great. Outside of that I'm a fairly big reader and I enjoy reading both articles and books unfolded and have no interest in bringing a second device to do so. I also write notes with stylus on it which is practical unfolded. More real estate for video etc. And then I can just fold it and use…

pixel fold doesn’t seem to have a stylus, does it?

You don't necessarily need one to come with the phone; there are third-party stylus(es?), and as long as you have a decent way to store it in your pocket or on the the case, it's still handy.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#200
post #187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm never going back. I only type and respond to things unfolded, I have big hands and the split keyboard + bigger buttons are great. Outside of that I'm a fairly big reader and I enjoy reading both articles and books unfolded and have no interest in bringing a second device to do so. I also write notes with stylus on it which is practical unfolded. More real estate for video etc. And then I can just fold it and use…

pixel fold doesn’t seem to have a stylus, does it?

I use a Fold 4, which technically doesn't either, but Samsung provides a sort of dumb stylus that works pretty well plus case for some small additional amount. I imagine Google can do something similar.
Post reply on HN