Live data from Hacker News

Bard now open to use

bard.google.com

221–230 of 267 posts

Re: Bard now open to use

#222

> Bard isn’t currently supported in your country. Stay tuned! Lol, I'm in Germany :D I was wondering where all the people saying the same came from. Apparently not any country with an embargo, that was my theory.

Brazil, not available as well, what a fuck up in communication.

Re: Bard now open to use

#223
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Appeal to authority as a logical fallacy or rhetorical weakness refers to saying something is true by virtue of an authority figure saying it. Saying the king is wearing a crown is a statement of fact, not an appeal to authority. Saying Google paid a fine is a fact, not an appeal to authority.

This is where the confusion lies: > Saying Google paid a fine is a fact My point has been that Google believing they have consent for tracking usage of Bard is “valid”. Pointing to the fact that Google paid a fine to a particular legal authority as a reason for understanding that this consent is “not valid” is the appeal to authority. (Please also consider that you have “shifted the goalposts”.) Edit: I should apolog…

It’s cool dude, no worries.

Re: Bard now open to use

#225
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is where the confusion lies: > Saying Google paid a fine is a fact My point has been that Google believing they have consent for tracking usage of Bard is “valid”. Pointing to the fact that Google paid a fine to a particular legal authority as a reason for understanding that this consent is “not valid” is the appeal to authority. (Please also consider that you have “shifted the goalposts”.) Edit: I should apolog…

It’s cool dude, no worries.

I’m reminded of being asked as a young child what I want to be when I grow up. No joke, I’d often say something like “I wanna be a lawyer because I like to argue.”

Examining it as an adult I recognize that I just enjoy navigating the logic of various arguments. Kind of a stereotypical philosopher; really, young me just didn’t know “philosopher” was a thing. Way more applicable.

I appreciate your understanding!

Re: Bard now open to use

#226

After asking a few questions, I’m very disappointed with its quality compared to Bing Chat. My current AI chat benchmark is to ask about LLVM APIs. I’ve asked to both Bing Chat and Bard three questions: - What info can the LLVM lazy-value-info analysis pass analyze? - Can you give me code samples to use the info? - Can you give me a list on important LVI methods? Both fared well on the first question, but on the seco…

I never get good results with bing, not nearly as good as phind.com but to each their own. Soon I'll just be telling my autogpt go research something and report back and it'll talk to the Google/Bing ai's and go back and forth until its satisfied and come back and give me a run down.

Re: Bard now open to use

#227
post #50
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GDPR didn't exist when Google was a startup.

Google probably played a central part in why the GDPR came into existence.

But that's exactly the point. They were able to make things available WW because they did stuff the EU didn't like.

Re: Bard now open to use

#228
post #149

This is significantly worse than ChatGPT with GPT-4 for coding. I had an example from last week where I wanted to write a script to delete excess AWS AMIs based on some tags of ours. Then modified it to bucket them by a tag value and keep the last ten of each bucket. Then parallelize it so it is fast (we had 50k of them, oops). ChatGPT was able to completely write this perfectly. Absolutely mind blowing. Saved me pro…

Have you tried phind.com? Besides Codeium (vscode extension) this is my goto for code questions. They have some magic sauce, always better than bing, sometimes I go back to gpt4 just to say hey, and for times where i want to save a thread...
Post reply on HN