Live data from Hacker News

Google Pixel Fold

store.google.com

151–160 of 580 posts

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#151

Yikes. Google hasn't magically figured out how to fix the problem with the screens failing after a few hundred bends; neither has Samsung, which is most likely their display supplier. On top of that, there is no viable market for a phone over $1200 (and, arguably, no market for over $1000, ask Apple how their sales have been going down since the peak in 2015); what were they even thinking? This is ridiculous even for…

ITT plenty of posters love their folding phones they've had for years.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One could argue the same about every product. 1000$ for an iPhone? To do what chat and watch videos?

That's exactly what I say. I have the iPhone SE.

Yes, since the X I only get the cheaper iPhones. At least I know I can get 7-8 years of support for my phone so the price tag isn’t such a shock overall. But for a device that will be dropped in 3years?

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#153
post #114
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That should be 5 years from when you buy it. Planned obsolescence is not worth the same price as a product that will last 10 years.

The year is 2023. Who is still using an iPhone from 2013?

Not many people. But I'm using an iphone 8 from 2017 and it's still going strong. It was €800 when I purchased it. It probably has another 2 or 3 years in it.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#154

I just don't understand who wants these foldable phones, especially at the $1799 price point. I guess a use case is wealthy frequent travelers who don't want a separate device with a larger screen to watch movies/videos on the go? Someone help me out here.

Yeah this costs as much as a MacBook Pro.. absurd

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#155
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you use your phone an average of 5 hours a day for two years and then throw it in a junk drawer the hardware would cost less than 50cents per hour of use. I use my $800 iPhone about 30 minutes a day, keep it for 4 years, and spend about $1 per hour of use. I'd say the market is heavy cellphone users that use apps that benefit from the larger screen.

> If you use your phone an average of 5 hours a day for two years and then throw it in a junk drawer the hardware would cost less than 50cents per hour of use. I don't understand this type of justification. My fridge would cost around $65k for a 15 year lifetime at $0.50/hour. It just seems like a completely meaningless way to judge the value of something.

They're hoping to sell to you based on the value it provides rather than the cost to produce the thing.

Classic sales reframing tactic for obscene 500%+ margin products: You should buy this thing far above market rate because it's worth a lot to you, not because it's priced at a realistic BOM + labor + reasonable profit margin.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

hi, I want these folding phones. Though I took advantage of the ridiculous trade in offers that Samsung usually promotes with. Everything is just nicer on the bigger screen: messaging, browsing, videos, gaming. And that screen is always in my pocket. Can't read the QR code menu at the restaurant? Here, look at my pocket tablet. The technology is still in an awkward phase but I think slab phones will be obsolete in 5…

I don't want to have to lug a tablet everywhere, like some fulltime scribe.

I don't want a crease in my screen, which I've seen on every single one of these used for any length of time.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#157

This drives home to me what a bargain it is to be willing to carry a bag around.

I’m transgender, male to female; and going from a sidebag to carrying mainly just a purse has honestly been a blessing and a curse.

I’m aware I could obviously still rock a sidebag as a woman, I just generally don’t; lol, and honestly the smaller format of a purse has its advantages, too.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#158

I just don't understand who wants these foldable phones, especially at the $1799 price point. I guess a use case is wealthy frequent travelers who don't want a separate device with a larger screen to watch movies/videos on the go? Someone help me out here.

I'm never going back. I only type and respond to things unfolded, I have big hands and the split keyboard + bigger buttons are great. Outside of that I'm a fairly big reader and I enjoy reading both articles and books unfolded and have no interest in bringing a second device to do so. I also write notes with stylus on it which is practical unfolded. More real estate for video etc. And then I can just fold it and use…

That sounds nice, but I want the same foldable form factor for entirely opposite reasons.

I want a rough, minimalistic foldable like the old school Razr. Something that can take abuse.

I want to be able to flick it open and close with the snap of my wrist and stuff the folded form factor back into my pocket without worry.

I don't care if there's no screen covering the bezel. That'd make it less durable anyway. Two screens, similar to the Nintendo DS is fine.

I'm sick of the smartphone slab and exposed glass. I want a wallet shaped device with a protective plastic or metal shell on the outside.

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#159
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where did you find a savings account yielding 4%?

Some accounts in the UK have been offering 6+%

The best interest account listed on MoneySavingExpert.com is at 5%, with the condition that you do not withdraw within 3 years of a deposit. Presumably these 6% accounts have similar requirements?

Re: Google Pixel Fold

#160

I just don't understand who wants these foldable phones, especially at the $1799 price point. I guess a use case is wealthy frequent travelers who don't want a separate device with a larger screen to watch movies/videos on the go? Someone help me out here.

My dream combo is a small iPhone with best camera and an updated iPhone mini. I’d still rather have those but that prices out similarly… so I get it.
Post reply on HN