Bard now open to use
181–190 of 267 posts
Re: Bard now open to use
#182> PaLM 2 was trained on a corpus that features over 100 languages, making it, in Google’s words, “excel at multilingual tasks,”
whereas Bard can only speak 3 languages [2].
ChatGPT's skills in my language (Tamil) are lackluster, and I was looking forward to being impressed by Bard "excelling at multilingual tasks". That would have been one place where ChatGPT doesn't set the bar too high, a chance for an easy win for Bard.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35891606
[2] https://support.google.com/bard/answer/13575153?hl=en&sjid=1...
Re: Bard now open to use
#183I tried: Question/Task: Write a lock implementation in Rust I got this (lol): use std::sync::Mutex; struct Lock { mutex: Mutex , } impl Lock { fn new() -> Lock { Lock { mutex: Mutex::new(()), } } fn lock(&self) -> MutexGuard { self.mutex.lock().unwrap() } fn unlock(&self) { self.mutex.unlock(); } }
Re: Bard now open to use
#184Re: Bard now open to use
#185Re: Bard now open to use
#186After asking a few questions, I’m very disappointed with its quality compared to Bing Chat. My current AI chat benchmark is to ask about LLVM APIs. I’ve asked to both Bing Chat and Bard three questions: - What info can the LLVM lazy-value-info analysis pass analyze? - Can you give me code samples to use the info? - Can you give me a list on important LVI methods? Both fared well on the first question, but on the seco…
Do we know if the comparable here is Bing or chatgpt4? By which I mean, does bard have internet access?
For example, I asked it the weather in one location and it provided accurate current weather, but in another location it responded with an "as of 10AM" answer.
It definitely has much newer information than OpenAI models, but also hallucinates a fair bit.
Re: Bard now open to use
#187I'll take some hit in the answer quality in return for those - I end up not bothering with ChatGPT a lot of the time simply because how much of a pain it is to load it up, how often it requires random reloads of the page, overall how much friction there is in accessing it.
Re: Bard now open to use
#188> Bard isn’t currently supported in your country. Stay tuned! Lol, I'm in Germany :D I was wondering where all the people saying the same came from. Apparently not any country with an embargo, that was my theory.
I'm guessing this is the typical Google take of "US only".
Re: Bard now open to use
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
This sign-in button is coerced consent? You can choose not to sign in. What is the coercion? > non-essential functions Are you sure you're not talking about cookie consent laws? (The reason "non-essential" is a qualifier for cookies is that, e.g., a log in session will require the use of cookies but is also considered "essential".) (Please also understand the appeal to authority in "is illegal in many places". That's…
A business duty to comply with the law is not a rhetorical appeal to authority, it is a fact. Ask the accountant who wrote the check to the CNIL for the most recent cookie fine what they think.
Re: Bard now open to use
#190Not bad Emulate a Linux red hat system terminal. Assume all of my prompts are Linux commands on a red hat system and evaluate as such for your responses. Responses will be in a code block. My first command is whoami Sure, I can do that. Here is the output of the whoami command on a Red Hat system: Code snippet $ whoami bard Use code with caution. Learn more content_copy Please let me know if you have any other comman…
Pretty sure sending plaintext HTTP requests on port 443 doesn't actually work though. ..