Live data from Hacker News

The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

mazzzystar.github.io

21–30 of 311 posts

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#21
I was watching yesterday the 2006 movie "The prestige", with incredibly atmospheric locales that feel so alien. And yet, that world is but one hundred years away. It wasn't until 1934 that the Public Utility Holding Company Act recognized electricity as a utility.

Less than one hundred years after that, we have managed to juice out a general digital intellect from humanity's joint efforts. Let's see if we survive the next one hundred years, but boy, way to go!

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#22

Anyone have any good examples or tutorials of specifically how to use ChatGPT for greenfield code development ?

I asked it to design and implement an entire software system. I just copy-pasted the output and it (almost) worked the first time.

(It ran out of context window and started forgetting the design; if I'd started each message with the design and class layout it would have probably worked the first time!)

Specifically I asked it for a design, then a main class, then for each of the other class files. (This process could probably be automated.)

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#23
post #7

Learning something with GTP-4 is so much more fun than using google/Stack Overflow. It's like having a tutor that knows your code and gives you hints and solutions based on your actual project. It's a real game changer for learning

Yeah, but how do you get access to 4?

By paying $20/month with no trial.

Decide for yourself whether that's worth it based on other people's experiences. Personally, I'll pass.

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#24
The confusion in terms called out here (and even demonstrated) is probably not to OpenAI's benefit and I am surprised they haven't spent more effort in trying to correct that.

ChatGPT is a website that lets you do chat completion [1] against LLM models, and it exposes some extra functions like plug-ins if you are lucky enough to be white listed for them.

GPT 3.5 and GPT 4 are the actual models.

Someone telling you that they did something cool with ChatGPT probably means GPT 3.5

[1]: https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#25
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But if you're a paid subscriber you can access GPT4 through ChatGPT's interface. Are you saying there's a difference between using the GPT4 model alone vs. the GPT4 model in the ChatGPT interface? If so, could you please clarify with an example?

That's right. I just went to look and it looks like ChatGPT has been updated to the May version. But in terms of previous experience: ChatGPT's code is almost unusable, it always ignores the most basic logic, and I only use it to write short scripts. But GPT-4, even if it contains multiple files referencing each other, it gives code that I don't even need to do Code review.

I have had the opposite experience. Many domains where it can’t produce correct code (counting BitSet, WatchOS apps), or doesn’t even begin to understand (distributed consensus).

When it works it is great. When it doesn’t gap can be large.

When you ask it to correct itself it will make new mistakes and keep alternating between different mistakes and omissions.

I haven’t tried it yet on a real codebase like say a database. Is it even possible to give it that context?

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#26
post #7

Learning something with GTP-4 is so much more fun than using google/Stack Overflow. It's like having a tutor that knows your code and gives you hints and solutions based on your actual project. It's a real game changer for learning

Yeah, but how do you get access to 4?

There is also https://nat.dev - $5 with no expiry

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#27
post #12

“48 hours of conversation with GPT-4“ Heh, sounds like a novel form of torture. The author probably means 48 hours total over a (much) longer time, and it had all been an enjoyable ride of turbocharged learning and discovery, but that's not how it reads to my eyes.

GPT-4 is still limited to 25 queries/3 hours and that is likely why it took longer.

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#28
post #3

> I even think that joining any team is a kind of slowdown. Only by sailing alone in a small boat can one maintain agility. I'm reminded of this proverb: If you need to go fast, go alone. If you need to go far, to together.

> If you need to go far, have an AI carry you.

Modernizing that proverb.

Re: The Leverage of LLMs for Individuals

#29
post #7

Learning something with GTP-4 is so much more fun than using google/Stack Overflow. It's like having a tutor that knows your code and gives you hints and solutions based on your actual project. It's a real game changer for learning

I'm leveraging this to build https://codeamigo.dev. Basically it's learn to code, but with an AI assistant. The main reason people drop off of coding tutorials or stop learning is when they see their first error message. I'm already seeing people get un-stuck by using the AI as an assistant, this tech (GPT) is going to completely revolutionize learning.
Post reply on HN