Completely tangential to the list itself, I find the only illustration in this article a bit jarring. It lists the adventures of Odysseus during his journey home and prominently highlights "7 years 'forced' to be a sex slave" with that section in the accompanying bar chart marked with hearts. The quotation marks and hearts suggest this is intended to imply that the sex was voluntary and he was free to leave at any time. I find this pretty vile, especially given that sexual abuse and rape of men by women is still a social taboo.
The story of the Odyssee describes Odysseus as being (literally) charmed by Calypso, a nymph with magical powers. Odysseus is described as longing for his wife, crying himself to sleep and Calypso using him for sex against his will. This is as straightforward as it gets when it comes to a description in Ancient Greece of a man being raped by a woman.
After skimming a few of the other unpaid articles it seems the author prefers implying their biases over outright stating them, often publishing articles with promising or suggestive titles, presenting two sides of an argument, then leaving the conclusion to the readers whose responses may or may not end up in the next article's "mailbag" section. Upon closer inspection the two sides are rarely truly representative of the entire spectrum of an issue, instead revealing a consistent political bent, e.g. Ayn Rand being contrasted with a free market liberal opinion.
It's always worth widening your horizon by reading material from people with contrasting opinions but it's also worth keeping in mind the bias of an author when engaging with their work, especially if it tries to appear objective and neutral.