Live data from Hacker News

Let G.M. go bankrupt

blogs.law.harvard.edu

71–72 of 72 posts

Re: Let G.M. go bankrupt

#71
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Is there a reason to bail those companies out of bankruptcy with tax payer dollars? If it's a company that would be almost certainly successful and profitable but is caught in a bind because of the freeze in capital, then it can be a good idea. The resulting economic slowdown can cost taxpayers significantly.

If it's a company that would be almost certainly successful and profitable but is caught in a bind because of the freeze in capital... Then Warren Buffett will buy it out. If it's a company that is a bad, high-risk investment, its managers will skip asking big outside investors (there are plenty of hedge funds and private equity shops with spare cash on hand) and go straight to the government.

Do you have evidence that supports this assertion? Warren Buffet is not all-knowing or infinitely wealthy.

Re: Let G.M. go bankrupt

#72
post #31
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Those who kept a well managed admin and saved for the worst should be rewarded, not those who failed. There's an interesting issue there, though. Given: 1 - in general, higher risk => higher reward (if the risk comes off ok) 2 - fast growing competitors can dominate a market, wage a price war or buy slower-growing companies Isn't there a potential problem that companies which are sensibly prudent can be simply out-…

GM was not ruined by a low-probability devastating event. They made bad management decisions over and over again for decades. This was a train wreck that everyone could see coming from miles away.

If anything, GM is a casualty of the huge asset bubble caused by 4-5 years of 1-1.75% interest rates (Greenspan). That bubble had to burst, and when it did, it was obvious that companies in bad shapes would be hit the most.

The fact that GM was in bad shape was its own doing, though.

Post reply on HN