Earlier quoted context omitted.
While I completely get what you're saying it's not really fair to expect Emacs to be compatible with systems that came after it. If you going to work in Emacs you have to pretty much work on its terms, which I think is fairly reasonable and speaking only for myself, I found very worthwhile. If you think it would make it more accessible to have certain changes, email the Emacs issue/bug people with constructive sugges…
It absolutely is fair to expect Emacs to use industry standard terminology to avoid confusing users. At this point, keeping the outdated, idiosyncratic terminology and default UI paradigms serves no purpose except unnecessary gatekeeping. > (then try doing the same with Apple or Microsoft and see what happens :-) ) Microsoft, the authors of Visual Studio Code, the editor most developers use? Whose team has been laude…
"Initial release 1976; 47 years ago" (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs).
There was no such standard terminology back then.
May I recommend you avoid using Emacs to avoid the concomitant headache of getting involved in Emacs discussions, thank you.It clearly isn't for you.