Contrast Rebellion
21–30 of 151 posts
Re: Contrast Rebellion
#22Weirdly, this site uses `color: #1b1b1b` instead of black. Why? The difference is barely noticeable, but black provides more contrast and IMO looks better than #1b1b1b. I've seen many designers assert that being slightly off-black is "better" for some reason, but isn't this the same argument that eventually leads to low-contrast designs? Why is a little bit of contrast reduction good, but a lot is bad? Pure black alw…
Re: Contrast Rebellion
#23Weirdly, this site uses `color: #1b1b1b` instead of black. Why? The difference is barely noticeable, but black provides more contrast and IMO looks better than #1b1b1b. I've seen many designers assert that being slightly off-black is "better" for some reason, but isn't this the same argument that eventually leads to low-contrast designs? Why is a little bit of contrast reduction good, but a lot is bad? Pure black alw…
First time I read an argument against all black in design was this 2012 article. Something about it not being a color found in nature. Then, yeah, some people seemed to interpret it as “use gray on gray”. https://ianstormtaylor.com/design-tip-never-use-black/
Re: Contrast Rebellion
#24Re: Contrast Rebellion
#25I annoyingly had to zoom in and out to read some of the texts on this site on mobile. Not to mention the deplorable scroll-hijack. I think we may need a whole series of rebellions.
Re: Contrast Rebellion
#26Weirdly, this site uses `color: #1b1b1b` instead of black. Why? The difference is barely noticeable, but black provides more contrast and IMO looks better than #1b1b1b. I've seen many designers assert that being slightly off-black is "better" for some reason, but isn't this the same argument that eventually leads to low-contrast designs? Why is a little bit of contrast reduction good, but a lot is bad? Pure black alw…
My site has a "dark mode" style theme - dark background and "white" text.
When I was initially designing the theme, I opted for a slightly-less-white text color, and as I've spent more time on it, I ended up bumping that color to be closer to pure white. (I'm using Tailwind, so this change amounted to "text-neutral-400" -> "text-neutral-300".)
I think I did this because the "more white" color seemed... sharper (very insightful, I know)? Like it was "an assault on the eye" to have the color be so bright. As I continued working on the site, I decided, in short, that that was stupid, and that I should have more contrast.
This was a good reminder for me that some of my pages need that styling updated, but it works out well for demonstrating the difference:
This page has the old, less contrasting color for the body text (text-neutral-400): https://epiccoleman.com/posts/2023-03-07-how-i-built-this-si...
This page has the new, "whiter" color (text-neutral-300): https://epiccoleman.com/posts/2023-04-05-svg-circle-of-fifth...
After skimming through these again as I linked them in this post, I think I could even bump it up to be even closer to white.
I also have a pretty bright monitor (it's an Apple Thunderbolt Display that I got for a pittance from my old office when they switched to Dell monitors). So that may be influencing me towards slightly less contrast.
Anyway, not to ramble, but I guess my point is - design is hard! It's not easy to take into account all the myriad different factors that need to be considered to make designs that look aesthetically pleasing while maintaining readability at various brightnesses and screen sizes and so on and so forth.
Edit: One other consideration - I wanted some color contrast between elements like text, headings, and the post date - so that's another thing I was trying to take into account. For example, if you want your headings to be a bit brighter than your text, you're left using (for example) text-neutral-200 for headings and text-neutral-300 for text. Again, as I continued tweaking, I realized that the size difference between headings and text does enough work establishing contrast that this was unnecessary - but it's just one more factor in a long list of things a designer has to think about to make things look right.
Re: Contrast Rebellion
#27It would be nice since they are advocating for readable text if the font sizes were appropriate on mobile. Even funnier is that lighthouse shows a multitude of accessibility problems in the page including.... low contrast. https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-contrastrebellion-c... Apparently the reason for the awful sizing on mobile is missing the responsive viewport meta tag... IDK, I agree with the content of…
Re: Contrast Rebellion
#28I annoyingly had to zoom in and out to read some of the texts on this site on mobile. Not to mention the deplorable scroll-hijack. I think we may need a whole series of rebellions.
Re: Contrast Rebellion
#29Re: Contrast Rebellion
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
First time I read an argument against all black in design was this 2012 article. Something about it not being a color found in nature. Then, yeah, some people seemed to interpret it as “use gray on gray”. https://ianstormtaylor.com/design-tip-never-use-black/
Funny, all these strange glyphs also don't seem to appear in nature ...
In the case of characters, especially hanzi/kanji, ones that are hard to recognize/distinguish either evolve (simplify and/or develop disambiguating features) or fall into disuse. Clearly “hard to recognize” is driven by physiological structures that are by definition “natural”