Live data from Hacker News

TV series about startup failures

1984.design

11–20 of 162 posts

Re: TV series about startup failures

#11
This needs to be made. I am often contemplating writing down my startup story which almost killed me (ambulances with sirens, multiple times) and then failed. I really think people should document the actual stories.

Also kitchen nightmares/hotel hell for companies. It would be a hit, but without the woke American additions; just go full Ramsey UK style.

Re: TV series about startup failures

#12

One of the funny/sad consequences of watching Silicon Valley, is that a lot of my friends (in my African country where only 4% has electricity) think that the startup need to expand no matter what, even if it has no viable business model, you can run a "budgetivore" business for many years like Linkedin/Amazon and in the end you will find a business model. So imagine. Instead of building good and sound startups that…

That's not what your African friends think, that's literally a very huge part of the startup ecosystem anywhere.

I have worked in few startup incubators, and most of the companies I've seen are merely interested in getting a good evaluation and getting bought from someone else.

The amount of startups I've seen with the interest of actually making any "profit" is very low.

I think this is also a reflection of several changes in how stock markets have changed in the last decade where the name of the game hasn't been anymore about making a successful product that makes money and possibly pays dividends but the chase for endless and endless growth of stock price.

There are companies out there that literally have the stock of their price in the hall of their offices, imagine that and not customer satisfaction/retention/profits or anything else being the biggest indicator of a company's success.

It's a sad reality.

I myself am interested in creating a new business in the tech world, one that makes honest good money but is not seeking a 100M/1B valuation and I feel such a unicorn.

Re: TV series about startup failures

#15

'Halt and Catch Fire' (Fictional but good) 'Sillicon Valley' (Fictional and comedy but also good) 'The Playlist' (About Spotify, which isn't failure)

Silcon valley was brilliant, although they blended the stories of several companys fatal errors into one company, turning it into a Hans in Luck

HCF uses the same technique

Re: TV series about startup failures

#17

'Halt and Catch Fire' (Fictional but good) 'Sillicon Valley' (Fictional and comedy but also good) 'The Playlist' (About Spotify, which isn't failure)

HCF was a great show, and one of the only shows that goes as far back as the BBS days before the Web “caught on”. The cast is pretty good. Highly recommend watching.

Re: TV series about startup failures

#18

This needs to be made. I am often contemplating writing down my startup story which almost killed me (ambulances with sirens, multiple times) and then failed. I really think people should document the actual stories. Also kitchen nightmares/hotel hell for companies. It would be a hit, but without the woke American additions; just go full Ramsey UK style.

I’m intrigued. Would you mind sharing a TL;DR?

Re: TV series about startup failures

#19

On „General Magic“, recently read „Build“ by Tony Fadell. I can recommend that for people interested in building startups. Will also give a bit more background on General Magic

"The reason you should care about the story of General Magic is because it involves something fundamental, and that is, failure is not the end, failure is actually the beginning."

Re: TV series about startup failures

#20

'Halt and Catch Fire' (Fictional but good) 'Sillicon Valley' (Fictional and comedy but also good) 'The Playlist' (About Spotify, which isn't failure)

HaCF has an amazing line in it: "Computers aren't the thing. They're the thing that gets us to the thing." (1)

I still think abut it frequently. It's true. It's a statement about systems - often the utility is what they enable, not thing "thing in itself".

Even deep into software development, this is true. e.. I really appreciate git and github, but I don't need to focus on becoming a "git maestro" , I just need to get by in git, because git for me "isn't the thing", it's just "the thing that gets me to the thing".

Likewise, we can make software for people who are clever, even brilliant in what they do but who don't care abut the details of that software because for them it's not "the thing".

1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeY_5n75zPM

Post reply on HN