Tunnel of Eupalinos
11–20 of 35 posts
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#12>The Eupalinian aqueduct was used as an aqueduct for 1100 years What things today will be used for 1100 years?
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#13>The Eupalinian aqueduct was used as an aqueduct for 1100 years What things today will be used for 1100 years?
The Panama and Suez canals are good candidates.
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#14I'm curious about this "silting up" described by the article. Was it preventable? Did it happen due to lack of maintenance?
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#15The diagrams in the article show how they changed the lateral direction of both tunnels to ensure they would collide in the horizontal plane, and expanded the ceiling of one tunnel and the floor of the other to ensure they would also intersect in the vertical plane. The diagrams in the article are illuminating, with some thought you can see it’s a very robust error correction mechanism that requires only a fraction more digging effort, and only requires precise measurements of the length of each tunnel (much easier to precisely measure than the angle or level!). Fascinating stuff.
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#16I'm curious about this "silting up" described by the article. Was it preventable? Did it happen due to lack of maintenance?
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#17>The Eupalinian aqueduct was used as an aqueduct for 1100 years What things today will be used for 1100 years?
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's actually not in there, but in one of the sources quoted. > 4 Techniques for measuring altitude : Altitude measurements seem to have been made with a chorobates, a primitive leveller with a vessel for water, or forerunners of this instrument. Eupalinos probably measured the south and independently the north entrances more than to check once his between results and to obtain a higher level of accuracy. He would ha…
> the closing error of the levelling is small, only a few decimetres I guess "millimeters" in the article is in error. Decimeters is much more believable.
Re: Tunnel of Eupalinos
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Panama and Suez canals are good candidates.
Assuming no AI takeover, massive technological increase, civilizational collapse due to dysgenics and lack of cheap energy, etc.
The AI will have to move goods, technology change will still need to move goods, civilisations will rise and fall and still need to move goods. Even if energy gets more expensive, trade will still occur.