Live data from Hacker News

Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

brave.com

491–494 of 494 posts

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#491
post #434
post #379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Life's too short to do direct hotel bookings. The sites are slow and terrible to navigate even when they're not straight-up broken. They never bother to tell you their cancellation policy, filling in your information is a drag and you don't get a proper calendar entry unless you make one manually.

Maybe I just know how to pick good hotels? Every single point you just mentioned has not applied to the way I typically do it, the cancellation policy is always the first thing I look for and make sure it’s clearly spelled out. I’ve never had any problems actually interacting with the sites either.

I'd be interested to know what your process is if you've got a way to reliably pick out boutique hotels whose websites don't suck without taking too long over it. E.g. I'm going to Munich in August - want to talk me through what you'd do?

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#492
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> (For anyone who's ever tried to modify a reservation, the difference is astonishing. If you're booked with the hotel, all kinds of adjustments are at least possible. If you're booked with Booking, Travelocity, Expedia, etc., it's somewhere between hard and hopeless.) That's utterly backwards IME. On Booking.com, most modifications are the push of a button (that, crucially, is right there in the UI that I already kn…

Do you have a vested interest in Booking.com? Interesting that you vehemently defend a common negative experience that booking through third parties is garbage, but you only seem to be defending this particular website.

Nope, just a happy customer. I'm sure other booking websites are similar (I used to use Agoda a long time ago), but I don't want to speak outside my own experience.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#493
post #353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they censor "misinformation" in one case, what's to stop them from censoring other "misinformation"? Maybe the COVID lab leak theory is deemed misinformation and removed from your search result. But it's not 100% proven either way, who is to say that this is "misinformation"? It's one thing to suggest an opinion that's just more popular, it's another to remove the competing opinions

Oh boy that slope sure seems slippery doesn't it? You know that reasoning can be applied to literally any removal right? There's _tons_ of stuff that it would be pretty reasonable to remove (and I'm sure you'd agree that things like CP shouldn't be on there etc.). There's also plenty of stuff that they would likely _have_ to remove if the state told them to (I don't have direct evidence of this happening, so take it…

CP and unlawful content is what the state forces them to remove. Other opinions are exactly the slippery slope I am talking about.

Russian propaganda is propaganda and lies, but if you remove one type of lies, then why not COVID misinformation? No government is FORCING them to any of this, so it's a slippery slope

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#494

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably watching for new DNS entries gets you most of the way there. When you fire up any new website you usually get a pile of visits from mysterious cloud boxes in the first 24 hours before you are listed on any search engine. I assume that's how they find you.

How does one watch for new DNS entries? I was under the assumption that iterating the contents of a DNS zone isn't desirable now so is usually disabled/deprecated.

Not a DNS expert but I believe you can get regularly updated copies of zone files from ICANN. To get domains not under their observation I expect you can go out and make deals with registrars on an individual basis. For an individual or small organisation, probably easier would be to subscribe to an API that does it.
Post reply on HN