Live data from Hacker News

Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

arstechnica.com

331–335 of 335 posts

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#331

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Some crap for free". Come on now. Give credit where credit is due if you're going to talk about balanced scales. React PyTorch Flow React Native Folly RocksDB llama HHVM Relay Fresco zstd Buck Sapling Redex JSX infer

In fairness, Flow is OSS in name only and almost all major adopters have switched to Typescript after they committed to ignoring the community. Jest was wildly neglected with serious issues for a long time. Yarn shipped with major issues that made it unusable for years, then was handed off to the community. Prepack was "shipped" and immediately killed. JSX has been stagnant despite the community wanting to move the (…

It's true that Facebook didn't commit to maintaining these projects on an ongoing basis, but that has nothing to do with the fact that they did release lots of major projects under an open source license, projects written by highly skilled engineers that could have been kept internal.

You're free to fork these repos and maintain them yourself if you'd like, and that freedom exists only because the code was made available under a FOSS license in the first place.

The alternative to this situation is not "open source code maintained in perpetuity", but "code that was never made open source in the first place".

There's no obligation for maintaining or ensuring that the open source code remains useful to you, so the criticism that projects are being open sourced and ignored might be valid, but the criticism that Facebook doesn't release major projects as FOSS is not.

We've all been spoiled by the hard work people have been putting in maintaining their FOSS repos, to the point where we now expect it. Most FOSS licenses include wording such as: THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS” and that's what these repos are: code provided to you as is, free of charge and no strings attached (other than what the license specifies).

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are you talking about? You can fork the code and go nuts. There's an open source license attached to the code. It's the definition of free and open source code. Jesus we're getting into demented territory here.

There’s a big difference between theory and practice though. If there’s not actually a community of developers, then the project dies. We’ve all seen fauxpen source projects close up shop immediately after their corporate developer deems them useless. Or better yet, actively reject all external contributions.

The [GNU] Free Software Definition

The free software definition presents the criteria for whether a particular software program qualifies as free software.

A program is free software if the program's users have the four essential freedoms:

* The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).

* The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

* The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2)

* The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3).

By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#333
post #287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I don't think you should be able to opt children into atheistic teaching.

You can't opt in to "atheistic teaching", it's simply the result of not opting in to any of the religious options.

You probably can indoctrinate someone with atheism, but it is, as you say, alao a potential outcome of rejecting the other options.

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These are genuinely not interesting except PyTorch which thankfully is now a project of The Linux Foundation.

Ah, so it doesn't count as open source unless it's interesting for you.

I think you misunderstood the word crap in your original comment. It has several meanings including stuff.

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#335
post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is the social pressure for kids to be popular somehow new or?

Do you rephrase my comment reductively because you're okay with corporations monetizing children via addictive dark patterns, in defiance of recommendations from child psychologists? or

https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/health-advi...
Post reply on HN