Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was tempted to ask you to do "Balls" next! I love those kinds of games.
ew
Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
211–220 of 223 posts
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes there are clearly real magic questions like why are we, where are we etc but not if we have a soul
We can't even define what intelligence is, and soul is a much subtler matter.
We know that you can't survive without a brain. We know that your personality changes if your brain gets damaged.
It's very far fetched to talk about soul as anything else than just fantasy.
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
We are only aware of the mind's internal representation of objective reality.
Who is aware? The atoms in the brain are aware?
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
> very interesting, do you know the name of this phenomenon? Not OP, but they are describing apophenia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia Many things can trigger it, even high doses of caffeine (such as drinking too much coffee).
Hyperassociativity is not necessarily apophenia. Apophenia is finding meaningful patterns in random noise, but it is not clear that the patterns being discovered were in random noise, or if the person merely saw the present patterns more clearly. That can happen too, and is not apophenia. It's something more like hypercognition
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#215Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#216If there's one hill I'm determined to die on (given the information that I have anyway) is that any scientific finding extrapolating information from "brain waves" or "region activation" is little more than modern day phrenology. Of course this is not an original thought, though I find it alarming that it's the minority opinion seeing as EEG/fMRI augury suffers from blatant methodological and even statistical flaws.…
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is "provide no predictive power" achieved?
> How is "provide no predictive power" achieved? It's very similar to being untestable. If a hypothesis provides a prediction, but can alter the interpretation after the event to fit the facts, then it's providing no predictive power. e.g. If someone predicts that rewards/punishes people when they die (which alters their near death experience), but then amends their interpretation of good/bad to fit the data, then it…
Is this an accurate and comprehensive description of the situation we have before us though?
> If someone predicts that rewards/punishes people when they die (which alters their near death experience), but then amends their interpretation of good/bad to fit the data, then it can't be used to predict anything.
That you can identify one attribute of this nature is no guarantee that all attributes (which is not known) are of this kind.
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No matter how in touch one might feel with whatever mystic stuff out there, no matter how profound it might feel, I've yet to see any evidence whatsoever of that somehow proving there effectively is something out there. Doesn't matter those feelings are very real, but it's just.. feelings. Do you have a pretty diverse range of experiences on psychedelics backing this up?
'back up' is a bit hard because of the anecdotal nature, but for me this is just the most logical explanation and as said: I have yet to see even the slightest piece of scientific evidence pointing to something else. Whereas there's enough of science supporting the way I think. I remain skeptical of course, though it's more of a 'I want to belive' type of thing.
"The most 'logical' explanation" is very often a function of psychedelic usage (and various other experiences one may have had, or not).
> and as said: I have yet to see even the slightest piece of scientific evidence pointing to something else. Whereas there's enough of science supporting the way I think.
In actual science, an abscence of evidence is not proof of abscence though.
> I remain skeptical of course, though it's more of a 'I want to belive' type of thing.
For both sides!
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But it’s not magical either. What is the meaning of magical in this context though?
It’s not something that cannot be understood in terms of neurons sending ions across membranes and electrical potentials.
Re: Brain activity of dying people shows signs of near-death experiences
#220Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hyperassociativity is not necessarily apophenia. Apophenia is finding meaningful patterns in random noise, but it is not clear that the patterns being discovered were in random noise, or if the person merely saw the present patterns more clearly. That can happen too, and is not apophenia. It's something more like hypercognition
The original context of the discussion was altering consciousness under the influence of psychedelics. The phenomenon of apophenia is well known in that context and has some unfortunate side effects that overlap with other communities, such as the conspirituality subculture, all of which make use of an almost institutionalized form of apophenia that is accepted as valid by their adherents. More interestingly, this ki…