Live data from Hacker News

Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

arstechnica.com

311–320 of 335 posts

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1501...

If I understanding you correctly you are saying that Meta's reputation is on public trial, which I think is accurate.

Yeah that’s what I’m getting after

It’s reasonable to assume criticism in that context

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#312

Mark Zuckerberg himself seems to understand the importance of privacy very well, taping over the microphone and camera on his MacBook Pro, keeping his trash can from being scavenged by others, and FB spending heavily to protect his security, so why does he have the exact opposite attitude towards others?

He’s basically a celebrity and billionaire. His privacy concerns are on a completely different scale than ours.

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if it kind of sucks to recognize that your job in FOSS is just a token gesture. Does FB really care about React’s contribution to the community? Or is it just happy to pay a few salaries to look good?

FB actively uses it, so it's a win win isn't it?

That is a complicated question. They get marketing and a few more eyes delivering bug fixes. However they also get to deal with contributions going not exactly in the direction they want and either have to argue against or take maintenance burden on themselves. Also they limit the changes they can do. An internal framework they can change as they like. They know all users.

For different projects that works differently well.

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#314

The privacy issues almost seem moot at this point to be honest. Everything on Facebook is either a scam, scam adjacent, or some kind of grift. It's actually incredible to see how Facebook has grown over the years. It's like the SPAM inbox in Gmail, but prettier and sprinkled with posts from "friends." Instagram has gone the same way. I would say that, "Maybe I'm just getting old," but when I actually look at the huma…

I agree but they're Groups, Messenger and Marketplace offerings are best in the industry. It's what myself and most of my friends use it for now.

Funny. Groups is, by far, the worst offender in the entire Meta ecosystem. It's become THE TOOL for scammers. And because they can be private they can hide for much longer than they'd otherwise be able to. I actually feel confident in saying that Jan 6 would not have happened (the way it did) without Facebook Groups. It's a breeding ground for the worst of the worst to hang out in plain sight.

If you want to prey on seniors, if you want to run an MLM or affiliate marketing ring, or if you want to organize an insurrection or promote a conspiracy or antivax group Facebook Groups is THE PLACE. By absolute volume it's way worse the Telegram groups. Old people can't figure out Telegram, but Facebook Groups is their jam.

If you really want to make "six figures online" while working "four hours a week" all you need is a scammer mentality and a few Facebook Groups. Message me for access when you're ready to level up your life.

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#315
post #74

The government is THE entity entrusted with creating personal property rights, amongst a lot of other things. (Assuming colonial debt as a national debt being how the revolutionaries bought their new country legitimacy.) So it’s about time for government to grant people sovereignty over their data and attention by creating some new personal property rights and protections. Keeping PII should be billable hours. Attent…

> Attention should be billable hours. You are the one who wants to visit my website because it provides you with value and I am now obligated by force to pay you?

If moneys being made off of it then it’s not free.

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Deliberately manipulating" is a biased term that negatively taints your statement. With the bias removed, the statement's ambiguity is revealed. You must unpack what you mean by "deliberately manipulating". For example, teaching and parenting is a form of deliberately manipulating. Picking my kid up when he's about to fall down a slide is deliberately manipulating. Handing him a banana is deliberately manipulating.…

Caffeine is a drug, but when someone says "I don't want my kids doing drugs" we all know they aren't talking about Dr. Pepper. You knew exactly what they meant, why pretend otherwise?

Upon a second reading I can see more specificity due to the focus on "advertising". I still think that unpacking what is good and what is bad advertising is a difficult line to draw.

Statements like "manipulating children is bad" are kinda worthless statements. They are simply inflammatory. We need to speak more precisely and with more clarity in order to elevate each other's understanding. We cannot simply make simple statements for decades and expect things to progress in any meaningful way. The conversation itself needs to change.

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#317
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you spend time around the FOSS arms of most companies the value they see first is in PR, the second is recruiting, the third is free work. The engineers lead the projects out of passion but what the company sees is opportunity.

Maybe passion, maybe they lead because of financial compensation. Open source or not, I like my jobs to come with a salary attached.

Do you lead an open source project?

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#318
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd say Facebook was on-the-whole good when it was limited to .edu users. It had a purpose, it solved it better than previous options, and (critically!) it had a ceiling on total addressable userbase. Once it metastisized into "extract maximum revenue from maximum number of people," I think its soul was lost to greed.

> Facebook was on-the-whole good when it was limited to .edu users. You mean, when it was a sort of amihotornot for Harvard students?

Post-Harvard, pre-everyone

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Some crap for free". Come on now. Give credit where credit is due if you're going to talk about balanced scales. React PyTorch Flow React Native Folly RocksDB llama HHVM Relay Fresco zstd Buck Sapling Redex JSX infer

These are genuinely not interesting except PyTorch which thankfully is now a project of The Linux Foundation.

LLaMA is genuinely not interesting?

Re: Facebook has not been doing enough to comply with a 2020 privacy order: FTC

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These are genuinely not interesting except PyTorch which thankfully is now a project of The Linux Foundation.

LLaMA is genuinely not interesting?

im rooting for TensorFlow
Post reply on HN