Live data from Hacker News

MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

theverge.com

651–660 of 753 posts

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#651

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Microsoft needs to think hard how hostile they want to be to its competitors and users, because two people can play this game. I don't get Microsoft, have they no pride or desire to become a great company? Have they just become content to be an old corporate software house who only manages to keep users through dark patterns and anti-competitive behaviour because they have given up on making products which people e…

Arguably, Microsoft is why a browser's user-agent is so useless for determining supported features. https://webaim.org/blog/user-agent-string-history/ The context is explained prior, but the part I'm pointing to is: > And Microsoft grew impatient, and did not wish to wait for webmasters to learn of IE and begin to send it frames, and so Internet Explorer declared that it was “Mozilla compatible” and began to imperson…

I think user agent strings were a terrible idea from the get-go, so I'm OK with Microsoft (and everyone else) fudging them this way. I think it'd be even better if everyone used the exact same UA string.

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#652

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So.. how does everyone feel about their stuff on GitHub right now?

... or about needing a Microsoft (GitHub) account to publish Rust packages (on crates.io).

I was surprised to hear this so I went searching. Yep. Wow. [1]

I use GitHub all the time but I never expected it to be mandatory if you wanted to publish a package for a popular open source language.

But as the top says, “If you are interested in helping with this work, please feel free to get started!” (Though only if you’re a contributor or open a duplicate issue)

[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/issues/326

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#653

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can favourite HN comments if you just want to come back to them.

To clarify, since it's not obvious in the UI, you have to click the timestamp of the comment, and then you can favorite it.

Damn, I've been here for years and never knew that you could favorite things!

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#654

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I never understood why Microsoft thought cloning chrome was a good thing for adoption. It’s all about Electron. There may be a Microsoft contingent that thinks it’s the future or maybe they are just hedging, but for now it’s important for stuff like Teams.

Small correction: the new teams client (currently in preview) uses WebView2 (based on Edge/Chromium), not Electron

I'm disappointed that they're still going with a web-based thing, but maybe WebView2 will suck a little less than Electron. I'll take what I can get.

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#655

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't use either chrome or edge but why would I use a clone instead of the real thing? I never understood why Microsoft thought cloning chrome was a good thing for adoption. Edge is just chrome now but with some annoying bloat like the coupon pop-ups and pay later scams.

Previous Edge was a complete refactor of IE with a brand new js engine. Extremely lightweight and low power compared to Chrome. Their goal was to be 100% compatible with the modern web. Google started breaking pages as soon as it detected it was running on Edge and not Chrome. Simply changing the user-agent string magically repaired the pages. So MS gave up and forked Chrome.

If that was the reason, surely it would have been quicker and easier to change the default user agent string themselves?

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#656

So much for the "but Microsoft is a new company now". Remember "Microsoft loves open source" phrase from just few years ago? Guess what, Ike also loved Tina.

Recall that Microsoft initially tried to make the hot reload feature of .NET 6 available only in Visual Studio. Their 3E strategy continues to this day.

You are saying they are 3E:ing their own product? It sounds like what you are describing is a lot closer to open-core.

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#657
post #623

You can't embrace open source, stand for freedom on the Internet, and simultaneously engage in dark patterns like this without destroying user trust. And trust with users is the currency of the 21st century as much as data is the new oil. Microsoft needs to get their brand straight and decide, once and for all, what they stand for. There was this incredible move towards open source, and embracing the modern web, and…

Microsoft is no better than an accounting firm at this point. The only reason they are still around is because of the data collection from spying on their users, and malign and coercive practices that are illegal but remain unenforced probably due to some backroom deal they made regarding the former. They had a few good ideas early on, and now that open source isn't patent bound (not gonna get into the rediculousness…

No, the reason they're around is because probably 95% of businesses in the US rely on their software in one form or another.

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#658

You can't embrace open source, stand for freedom on the Internet, and simultaneously engage in dark patterns like this without destroying user trust. And trust with users is the currency of the 21st century as much as data is the new oil. Microsoft needs to get their brand straight and decide, once and for all, what they stand for. There was this incredible move towards open source, and embracing the modern web, and…

Many of us kept our trust rating for MS right around zero despite their "embrace of open source"; it seems we were correct in recognizing it as nothing more than a recognition of market realities packaged up as a marketing ploy.

[deleted]

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#659
post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

URL types for geo locations are standardized. And even if they weren't or the standard isn't sufficient (which one could reasonably argue), you are talking about features made by the platform owner. Apple can trivially declare "this is the iOS geo share format, apps intending to share or handle shared geolocations should use this format" and expect the ecosystem to deal with it.

That’s a good point, although it seems that this kind of behavior, at least specifically to map apps, is quite common. Out of curiosity, I opened the Google app in iOS, searched for a place, and tapped on the result to open a map. Even with the default app set to Apple Maps, it goes straight to Google Maps. I haven’t been able to find the correct MIME type or URL protocol for a generic geo call, either, which makes m…

Google specifically handles all links in its apps so that they go to the corresponding google app if possible.

Re: MSFT is forcing Outlook and Teams to open links in Edge and IT admins are angry

#660

I have no skin in the game, but even I am starting to think the obvious thing here: Apple and Google own the entire mobile OS market. They could literally destroy Microsoft if they started to hugely degrade the experience of Microsoft products on iOS and Android with dark patterns a la Microsoft. But they don't. So far they were competing by making their own products better. Microsoft needs to think hard how hostile…

Yeah... Imagine if in iOS every link opened in Safari and the only alternative browsers allowed were reskins of Safari.
Post reply on HN